[untitled]
5 comments
Heavily discussed yesterday:
Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7 (155 comments)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185895
Boeing withdraws bid for safety exemption for Boeing 737 MAX 7 (155 comments)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185895
[0] (259 points, 22 hours ago, 155 comments)
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185895
Also related: "Opposition grows to Boeing 737 MAX 7 safety exemption"[1] (3 points, 4 days ago) "Boeing Requests Boeing 737 Max 7 Certification Exemption over Anti-Ice Issue"[2] (3 points, 25 days ago) "U.S. lawmakers decline to add Boeing 737 Max exemption in defense bill"[3] (37 points, 1 year ago)
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39142262 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38889084 [3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33890415
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39185895
Also related: "Opposition grows to Boeing 737 MAX 7 safety exemption"[1] (3 points, 4 days ago) "Boeing Requests Boeing 737 Max 7 Certification Exemption over Anti-Ice Issue"[2] (3 points, 25 days ago) "U.S. lawmakers decline to add Boeing 737 Max exemption in defense bill"[3] (37 points, 1 year ago)
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39142262 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38889084 [3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33890415
Oops, thanks, edited.
This isn't about the 737-MAX, it's about a new sub-model which currently only exists as a prototype and is undergoing a lengthy test and certification process.
AFAIK it's scheduled to start passenger flights end of this year or year early next year and this specific issue might have no impact on that.