Why do regexes use `$` and `^` as line anchors?(buttondown.email)
buttondown.email
Why do regexes use `$` and `^` as line anchors?
https://buttondown.email/hillelwayne/archive/why-do-regexes-use-and-as-line-anchors/
18 comments
Explanations and speculation: are they mutually exclusive? I'd say an answer from Ken Thompson would be a definitive explanation that might disprove the author's explanation, but that doesn't mean it's not an explanation.
> Explanations and speculation: are they mutually exclusive?
Yes. You only need to speculate when you don’t have a firm explanation.
> disprove the author's explanation
Speculation is “the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence”, which is what the author is doing. They’re not explaining, they’re guessing at a reason.
Yes. You only need to speculate when you don’t have a firm explanation.
> disprove the author's explanation
Speculation is “the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence”, which is what the author is doing. They’re not explaining, they’re guessing at a reason.
[deleted]
Ken is still around; did the author reach out and ask? Could be a similar story to Rob Pike and the Go date format: he didn't think about it and just picked the first thing that came to mind.
The article devolves from fact to fiction/guesswork rather quickly.
This always made sense to me because they are next to each other on an AZERTY keyboard:
tab,A,Z,E,R,T,Y,U,I,O,P,^,$,return
Another roman car like effect.
Not sure about $ sign, but ^ probably comes from ADM-3A:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM-3A#Legacy
And here is a photo of its keyboard: https://twitter.com/toresbe/status/1756800589340549609/photo...
And here is a photo of its keyboard: https://twitter.com/toresbe/status/1756800589340549609/photo...
Per the article, these anchors appear in Ken Thompson's port of the QED text editor which dates back to 1970, years before even the ADM-1 terminal.
The article is all speculation and not fact. Sorry OP but this is just garbage content.
[deleted]
ijijijjij(1)
This article should be considered the $ word on this topic.
That’s not an explanation, it’s speculation. The whole article was guess work and you picked something that sounded plausible. Ken Thompson is alive, why not ask and confirm? Then you could say you have an explanation.