Canada investigates whether Tesla helped itself to a subsidy-fueled sales boom(fortune.com)
fortune.com
Canada investigates whether Tesla helped itself to a subsidy-fueled sales boom
https://fortune.com/2025/03/26/elon-musk-tesla-under-investigation-canada-wrongfully-boosting-sales/
64 comments
This story is hilarious. Yes, lots of people will want to buy Teslas when the government announces that the $5,000 subsidy is about to end. The other car manufacturers are just mad that they lost out due to their antiquated sales process. If they had direct purchase via online ordering, maybe they would have gotten a larger slice of that remaining subsidy money?
More or less hilarious than "billionnaire that builds companies that utterly depend on government subsidies but the companies are not doing well, goes into government to make the government more efficient and spend less" ?
How do these statements compare? You know, on a hilarity scale from 1 to 10?
How do these statements compare? You know, on a hilarity scale from 1 to 10?
>"billionnaire that builds companies that utterly depend on government subsidies but the companies are not doing well, goes into government to make the government more efficient and spend less"
Given that he's cutting government workers and programs he despises (eg. "DEI" or foreign aid), that's not too surprising. What people think is important is in the eye of the beholder, so it's not incongruent for someone to be pro government subsidies in their industry, but against other forms of government spending.
Given that he's cutting government workers and programs he despises (eg. "DEI" or foreign aid), that's not too surprising. What people think is important is in the eye of the beholder, so it's not incongruent for someone to be pro government subsidies in their industry, but against other forms of government spending.
"It's good when the government gives me money and bad when the government gives other people money" is the mentality of a child, and not a particularly bright one.
But "government gives me money" is how Jeff Bezos became the richest man in the world (lookup interstate commerce tax exemption). And "government gives me money" is how Elon Musk became the richest man in the world (both Tesla and SpaceX are running on government subsidies. Running as in they couldn't have grown without subsidies and can't maintain themselves without constant subsidies). "Government gives me money" is how Carlos Slim became the richest man in the world. And so on.
(btw: this is working on the assumption, if the government pays for a satellite launch, the government may get something, but it's still a subsidy. Even though SpaceX got plenty of subsidy too)
In fact, over the last century the mantle of richest man in the world has been worn by 12 people. In 7 cases it was a government that made them the richest man in the world. In 4 out of those 7 cases it was the US government.
That's disregarding that the military-industrial complex is full of rich companies that may not have conquered the very top spot, but are doing really, really well.
Getting the government to give you money, in the sense of sponsoring your business, has been THE path to incredible wealth.
(btw: this is working on the assumption, if the government pays for a satellite launch, the government may get something, but it's still a subsidy. Even though SpaceX got plenty of subsidy too)
In fact, over the last century the mantle of richest man in the world has been worn by 12 people. In 7 cases it was a government that made them the richest man in the world. In 4 out of those 7 cases it was the US government.
That's disregarding that the military-industrial complex is full of rich companies that may not have conquered the very top spot, but are doing really, really well.
Getting the government to give you money, in the sense of sponsoring your business, has been THE path to incredible wealth.
That's basically... every special interest group? Those teacher unions that more funding for schools, paid for by cuts to policing or more taxes? Clearly "the mentality of a child, and not a particularly bright one".
Wealth taxes have the same argument but plenty of people like them:
It's bad when the government takes my money via income taxes and good when the government takes other people's money via wealth taxes
It's bad when the government takes my money via income taxes and good when the government takes other people's money via wealth taxes
> due to their antiquated sales process
I don't think anyone wants a larger slice of the pie, I think they want the share of the pie that they earned that was consumed by (what appears to be) outright fraud on Tesla's part. Tesla's numbers are implausible at best, at least showing some unusual and unexplained behavior. They exhausted the credits with the incredibly dubious sales. Why shouldn't they be investigated?
I don't think anyone wants a larger slice of the pie, I think they want the share of the pie that they earned that was consumed by (what appears to be) outright fraud on Tesla's part. Tesla's numbers are implausible at best, at least showing some unusual and unexplained behavior. They exhausted the credits with the incredibly dubious sales. Why shouldn't they be investigated?
Those numbers aren't implausible at all. It equates to about two months of sales during a normal period, and is easily explained by people who were planning to buy a Tesla in the next 3-6 months rushing to get their orders in. People are very motivated when there is a $5,000 discount on the line.
This just seems like sour grapes from traditional dealerships who subject their customers to multi-hour haggling sessions to close a sale. Is there any indication of malfeasance here other than Tesla selling a lot of cars?
This just seems like sour grapes from traditional dealerships who subject their customers to multi-hour haggling sessions to close a sale. Is there any indication of malfeasance here other than Tesla selling a lot of cars?
People rushed to get there orders in....3 months before the deadline all on the same weekend?
Highly implausible.
Also the terms of the rebate require finalized sales. The stores in question don't have the physical capacity to have made 8600 sales in 3 days. If they were batching earlier sales they shouldn't have used a later date as the sale date for the rebate.
So it's either fraud or sheer incompetence by Tesla Canada.
Highly implausible.
Also the terms of the rebate require finalized sales. The stores in question don't have the physical capacity to have made 8600 sales in 3 days. If they were batching earlier sales they shouldn't have used a later date as the sale date for the rebate.
So it's either fraud or sheer incompetence by Tesla Canada.
> It equates to about two months of sales during a normal period
It equates to two months of sales for the entirety of Canada happening in one weekend in one province.
It equates to two months of sales for the entirety of Canada happening in one weekend in one province.
... in one city of one province.
Yes, for accuracy, a large city, but one that only accounts for less than 4% of Canada's population.
Yes, for accuracy, a large city, but one that only accounts for less than 4% of Canada's population.
Someone had a better suggestion in a comment chain above, which is that it's the responsibility of the dealer to request the rebate on behalf of the customer, and they apparently submit them in batches. So an even more plausible explanation is that it's a combination of people rushing to buy before the rebate expires, and the Tesla dealerships panicking to get all their paperwork for the last month or two submitted before the money ran out.
Either way it should be trivial for the government to verify this, and they should be doing regular audits anyways to make sure dealerships aren't scamming customers out of their rebates. Making a huge deal out of this now just seems like political grandstanding though, since there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.
Either way it should be trivial for the government to verify this, and they should be doing regular audits anyways to make sure dealerships aren't scamming customers out of their rebates. Making a huge deal out of this now just seems like political grandstanding though, since there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.
> Someone had a better suggestion in a comment chain above, which is that it's the responsibility of the dealer to request the rebate on behalf of the customer, and they apparently submit them in batches. So an even more plausible explanation is that it's a combination of people rushing to buy before the rebate expires, and the Tesla dealerships panicking to get all their paperwork for the last month or two submitted before the money ran out.
Which still entails dealerships covering 4% of the national population to account for 18% of last year's national sales in a fairly short time frame, and also piles on the deeply unlikely claim that Tesla was paying out these rebates without bothering to file them for months on end.
Which still entails dealerships covering 4% of the national population to account for 18% of last year's national sales in a fairly short time frame, and also piles on the deeply unlikely claim that Tesla was paying out these rebates without bothering to file them for months on end.
Thanks for the correction, I didn't realize the fraud was that ostentatious!
>In January, four showrooms in three major cities managed to sell 8,600 cars in the span of just a weekend following news that the country would no longer help fund part of the purchase price for a new electric car under its iZEV program.
This is supposed to be suspicious? What's next? It's "suspicious" that Amazon had 5x the orders in the weekend after the fourth thurdsay in November? There's a pretty straightforward explanation: the government announced the subsidies were going to end, so all the potential buyers sitting on the fence or planning to purchase some time in the future made the leap and purchased immediately, causing a spike.
This is supposed to be suspicious? What's next? It's "suspicious" that Amazon had 5x the orders in the weekend after the fourth thurdsay in November? There's a pretty straightforward explanation: the government announced the subsidies were going to end, so all the potential buyers sitting on the fence or planning to purchase some time in the future made the leap and purchased immediately, causing a spike.
Either you can believe that four dealers sold eighteen times the countrywide sales per day
after an +80% drop in sales
in a country that has one tenth the population of the US
whose CEO was/is probably the second-most hated person in Canada
and all of the sales qualified for the rebate despite most of their models not qualifying for the rebates
and Tesla's vehicle sales were exactly enough to completely drain the fund but not a penny more
...or you can think that this is almost certainly fraud.
after an +80% drop in sales
in a country that has one tenth the population of the US
whose CEO was/is probably the second-most hated person in Canada
and all of the sales qualified for the rebate despite most of their models not qualifying for the rebates
and Tesla's vehicle sales were exactly enough to completely drain the fund but not a penny more
...or you can think that this is almost certainly fraud.
[deleted]
You don't think it's suspicious that those four showrooms each sold 2,150 cars in a single weekend?
I mean sure, there's a chance that happened for real, but "suspicious" doesn't mean "there was definitely something shady going on", it means "maybe there was something shady, this deserves a closer look".
I mean sure, there's a chance that happened for real, but "suspicious" doesn't mean "there was definitely something shady going on", it means "maybe there was something shady, this deserves a closer look".
It’s possible there were cars sold before that weekend that didn’t have credits registers yet. And also possible that a lot of people placed orders that weekend to take advantage of the credit. (Which was how the program was supposed to work, consumers like credits, consumers sign deals to get credits).
This is just divisive political agendas from the Canadian media
This is just divisive political agendas from the Canadian media
Why are you blaming the Canadian media here? The story appears to be about action by a Canadian government.
"No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid" - Freeland.
That seems like a very reasonable statement by the government, very different from the media reports.
That seems like a very reasonable statement by the government, very different from the media reports.
Full context there is:
> “No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid,” said Freeland in a statement to the Tornoto Star.
That's a statement that was made to and then reported by the media. That's kind of how journalism works.
> “No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid,” said Freeland in a statement to the Tornoto Star.
That's a statement that was made to and then reported by the media. That's kind of how journalism works.
Are we supposed to believe this not specifically designed to get engagement from the Elon-hate trend? Are the same media outlets going to be promoting apologetic stories when/if in 6 months the verdict comes back that everything was on the up-and-up? And they wonder why people hold journalists/media outlets in low regard. Full disclosure. I've never owned a Tesla, don't currently own a Telsa, and have no plans on owning a Tesla in the future. I have only been inside of Tesla for a 5-minute backseat car ride in ~2018. I don't own any Tesla stock, have never owned Tesla stock, and have no plans on owning Tesla stock in the future.
If a government takes action like this, it is newsworthy whether or not it's "designed to get engagement from the Elon-hate trend".
I would thinks a newsworthy-only story would end after "Tesla did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment." And I'd think a better wording for
"...reported on the suspiciously high number of EV rebate claims in the final January days of the program."
...might be:
"...reported on the unusually high number of EV rebate claims in the final January days of the program."
...and then maybe have a comparison to other dealerships sales increases in the same period, maybe even include a chart showing the weekly Tesla sales for the past year or two. And including a quote similar in spirit to pseudo0's observation in this thread:
"Yes, lots of people will want to buy Teslas when the government announces that the $5,000 subsidy is about to end. The other car manufacturers are just mad that they lost out due to their antiquated sales process. If they had direct purchase via online ordering, maybe they would have gotten a larger slice of that remaining subsidy money?"
...how about:
"Tesla's simple, direct, online-only sales methods probably helped them secure the bulk of the last-minute $5,000 subisidies because other dealers couldn't react to quickly enough."
...that would go a long way in my mind to raising the bar of journalistic integrity.
"...reported on the suspiciously high number of EV rebate claims in the final January days of the program."
...might be:
"...reported on the unusually high number of EV rebate claims in the final January days of the program."
...and then maybe have a comparison to other dealerships sales increases in the same period, maybe even include a chart showing the weekly Tesla sales for the past year or two. And including a quote similar in spirit to pseudo0's observation in this thread:
"Yes, lots of people will want to buy Teslas when the government announces that the $5,000 subsidy is about to end. The other car manufacturers are just mad that they lost out due to their antiquated sales process. If they had direct purchase via online ordering, maybe they would have gotten a larger slice of that remaining subsidy money?"
...how about:
"Tesla's simple, direct, online-only sales methods probably helped them secure the bulk of the last-minute $5,000 subisidies because other dealers couldn't react to quickly enough."
...that would go a long way in my mind to raising the bar of journalistic integrity.
> "Tesla's simple, direct, online-only sales methods probably helped them secure the bulk of the last-minute $5,000 subisidies because other dealers couldn't react to quickly enough."
I think it's very telling that your definition of "journalistic integrity" includes a good amount of sycophancy for Musk.
"Simple, direct, online methods that other dealers can't react to"
Very "unusual" that in a city with 4% of Canada's population, that 20% of Canada's sales for the year were made in a year because of a US$3K price "drop".
I think it's very telling that your definition of "journalistic integrity" includes a good amount of sycophancy for Musk.
"Simple, direct, online methods that other dealers can't react to"
Very "unusual" that in a city with 4% of Canada's population, that 20% of Canada's sales for the year were made in a year because of a US$3K price "drop".
Wasn't it just last week that the Financial Times had to walk back the breathless $1.4 billion story about Tesla accounting fraud?
https://www.ft.com/content/d2711678-af23-4b71-852b-1ef2e932e...
This is like a textbook case outlined in E.T. Jaynes, "Probability Theory -- The Logic of Science", section 5.3:
https://www.med.mcgill.ca/epidemiology/hanley/bios601/Gaussi...
...from my life experience with accounting departments and auditors at largish publicly traded companies, my priors for financial fraud of a company like Tesla at the corporate level is something like a probability of 0.001 (1 in a thousand companies). At the branch office level, something higher, say 0.01. Maybe double or triple that with Musk in charge. Someone reporting on an emotionally-charged topic in an effort to collect clicks? Especially when relying on second or third hand reported information? My prior for them misunderstanding or misrepresenting the numbers (like the time frames involved, etc.) is closer to 0.50. Other people's mileage may vary.
https://www.ft.com/content/d2711678-af23-4b71-852b-1ef2e932e...
This is like a textbook case outlined in E.T. Jaynes, "Probability Theory -- The Logic of Science", section 5.3:
https://www.med.mcgill.ca/epidemiology/hanley/bios601/Gaussi...
...from my life experience with accounting departments and auditors at largish publicly traded companies, my priors for financial fraud of a company like Tesla at the corporate level is something like a probability of 0.001 (1 in a thousand companies). At the branch office level, something higher, say 0.01. Maybe double or triple that with Musk in charge. Someone reporting on an emotionally-charged topic in an effort to collect clicks? Especially when relying on second or third hand reported information? My prior for them misunderstanding or misrepresenting the numbers (like the time frames involved, etc.) is closer to 0.50. Other people's mileage may vary.
The author writes for Fortune Europe from Germany.
>You don't think it's suspicious that those four showrooms each sold 2,150 cars in a single weekend?
You don't think it's suspicious that Amazon has a huge order spike in the weekend after black friday? Maybe the FBI should investigate on the off chance they're trying to evade taxes, or launder money for Mexican cartels or whatever.
2150 cars seem pretty reasonable for sales that would otherwise have been made in the next 3-6 months, but were pulled forward by the threat of rebates being pulled.
You don't think it's suspicious that Amazon has a huge order spike in the weekend after black friday? Maybe the FBI should investigate on the off chance they're trying to evade taxes, or launder money for Mexican cartels or whatever.
2150 cars seem pretty reasonable for sales that would otherwise have been made in the next 3-6 months, but were pulled forward by the threat of rebates being pulled.
I don't think those car sales numbers are as unsurprising as those Amazon numbers.
What's your basis for 8,600 cars being "surprising"? The article says that works out to 18% of annual volume, which means the cancellation of the rebate brought forward just over 2 months worth of sales. That seems plausible to me. I could totally imagine myself making the leap and buying a car immediately if it meant that I'd save $10k (or whatever the rebate is) compared to if I bought 2 months later.
> The article says that works out to 18% of annual volume, which means the cancellation of the rebate brought forward just over 2 months worth of sales.
For the country. This happened in one city of one province.
Ottawa has 1.4M people in a country of 37M (4%).
So 18% of the country's entire volume for the year was sold in a city that has less than 4% of the population. In a weekend.
8600 vehicles sold, representing 18% of the vehicles sold in Canada = 48,000 in a year. Two months of sales would be 8,000. Recognizing that the population isn't evenly distributed, that is actually more like 320 is the expectation... not 8,600. Even multiplying that number by 10 to factor in things like urban/rural still gets you to less than a third of what Tesla claims was sold...
> I'd save $10k (or whatever the rebate is) compared to if I bought 2 months later.
Just over $3k ($5k CAD).
For the country. This happened in one city of one province.
Ottawa has 1.4M people in a country of 37M (4%).
So 18% of the country's entire volume for the year was sold in a city that has less than 4% of the population. In a weekend.
8600 vehicles sold, representing 18% of the vehicles sold in Canada = 48,000 in a year. Two months of sales would be 8,000. Recognizing that the population isn't evenly distributed, that is actually more like 320 is the expectation... not 8,600. Even multiplying that number by 10 to factor in things like urban/rural still gets you to less than a third of what Tesla claims was sold...
> I'd save $10k (or whatever the rebate is) compared to if I bought 2 months later.
Just over $3k ($5k CAD).
[deleted]
You and I evidently have different instincts here.
Why was it only at these dealerships. If it was a spike caused by the rebate ending, then it would been seen at all (or most) telsa dealerships across the country.
>Why was it only at these dealerships.
The article didn't say that. They only said the 4 dealerships had a spike of 8,900 cars, but doesn't say anything about any other dealerships.
The article didn't say that. They only said the 4 dealerships had a spike of 8,900 cars, but doesn't say anything about any other dealerships.
Well for one, these 4 showrooms accounted for 89% of the subsidy for the entire country.
> Tesla sold about 8,600 cars in three days at four separate stores in Canada, or roughly one every two minutes per showroom, in January.
Right. If, and only if, the stores were open 24/7.
Most are open 8 to 10 hours a day.
Tesla is claiming with a straight face that these three stores sold a new car EACH, every FIFTY SECONDS from opening to closing for three days straight.
> Moreover, according to Quebec-based Motor Illustrated, Tesla accounted for 89% of all claims filed during that period.
I think the word for this starts with "F" and ends in "raud".
> "No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid," said Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland in a statement to the Toronto Star.
I'm sure in the US we'd happily pay Tesla and maaaaaaaybe claw it back several years later. Maybe.
Right. If, and only if, the stores were open 24/7.
Most are open 8 to 10 hours a day.
Tesla is claiming with a straight face that these three stores sold a new car EACH, every FIFTY SECONDS from opening to closing for three days straight.
> Moreover, according to Quebec-based Motor Illustrated, Tesla accounted for 89% of all claims filed during that period.
I think the word for this starts with "F" and ends in "raud".
> "No payments will be made until we are confident that the claims are valid," said Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland in a statement to the Toronto Star.
I'm sure in the US we'd happily pay Tesla and maaaaaaaybe claw it back several years later. Maybe.
> the stores were open 24/7.
The stores are open 24/7. They're online sales. The "dealership" is just the place you pick up your car from.
The stores are open 24/7. They're online sales. The "dealership" is just the place you pick up your car from.
The article references the showrooms as the sales point.
Not "online sales". "Tesla sold about 8,600 cars in three days at four separate stores in Canada".
Yes, cars were sold online. This references Tesla recording the place of sale as those showrooms.
The contortions to defend Tesla are ridiculous.
If you believe Tesla, nearly 20% of its annual sales for the entirety of Canada happened around these four locations in one weekend. It just so, coincidentally, happened to be conveniently timed for subsidies.
Not "online sales". "Tesla sold about 8,600 cars in three days at four separate stores in Canada".
Yes, cars were sold online. This references Tesla recording the place of sale as those showrooms.
The contortions to defend Tesla are ridiculous.
If you believe Tesla, nearly 20% of its annual sales for the entirety of Canada happened around these four locations in one weekend. It just so, coincidentally, happened to be conveniently timed for subsidies.
All sales at Tesla dealerships are done online. They literally sit you in front of a web browser and guide you through buying the car online.
Almost all Tesla deliveries happen at dealerships no matter where they were ordered from. The delivery dealership is likely recorded as the place of sale.
Almost all Tesla deliveries happen at dealerships no matter where they were ordered from. The delivery dealership is likely recorded as the place of sale.
Yup, buy online and then barely any interaction with their staff is required to actually take delivery.
Tesla sold about 8,600 cars in three days at four separate stores in Canada, or roughly one every two minutes per showroom, in January.
I mean, it’s going to take more than two minutes just to convince the finance guy that if he mentions “paint protection” one more time, you’re walking out.
I mean, it’s going to take more than two minutes just to convince the finance guy that if he mentions “paint protection” one more time, you’re walking out.
That's not how it works for Tesla. Totally different buying experience. You order online, get a notification some days or weeks later that it's ready, go to the store sign a couple of documents and drive off with the car. Maybe 10 minutes total. (Source: bought a Tesla a few years ago). I just recently got a Kia EV9 and it was a 3-4 hour marathon of paperwork, talking, more paperwork. Really terrible buying experience. Nice car though.
Yeah that's one of the reasons my dad went with Tesla for his recent car purchase. My wife helped him get a RAV4 (Toyota) a few years ago and the three of us lost four hours on a weekend because of the song and dance that dealerships put you through. Never again. From now on it'll be Tesla, Rivian, Polestar, or Lucid instead.
Does Tesla do business differently in Canada than the U.S.? I thought purchasing in the U.S. was done through an app, and everything was one-price, no negotiation? Pick the options you want, and the car is delivered to your door at sometime in the future. And the showrooms were exactly that, places to show the car, no selling, no salesmen, no protection plan upselling, undercoatings, etc.. Maybe someone who has purchased a Tesla in Canada or the U.S. could chime in?
Does that exist for Tesla dealerships? I thought it’s all online and just the delivery happens in person.
See, they install that TruCoat at the factory, there's nothin' we can do, but I'll talk to my boss.
The numbers are highly suspicious, but the article doesn't seem to point to any actual specific accusation of wrongdoing. Were the cars sold to people in other countries and thus not eligible? Sold to corporate buyers and they're not eligible? The number of vehicles sold at the dealerships doesn't pass a sanity check but it's also unclear what is believed to have happened that was illegal. Were online sales ineligible for the subsidy so they were routed through dealerships? There appears to be smoke here but it's unclear where the fire is located, if it exists at all.
To try and steelman it: With Tesla you buy the car online, and don't sign the papers until you pick up the car. The day you sign the papers is perhaps the day you're considered to have bought the car, rather than the day you press the "buy" button. The cars tend to arrive in large batches, so it's very possible that a single months worth of sales arrived all on the same day and those papers were all signed on the same day.
A lot of trucks with cars.
The accusation is fraud
Doesn't Tesla let you order a car online? Does it need people to physically visit a store and spend an hour doing paperwork?
Second paragraph, first line:
> While a spike was to be expected and Tesla orders are typically filed online rather than at a physical store, that nonetheless works out to two cars sold every minute of every hour for three days straight.
> While a spike was to be expected and Tesla orders are typically filed online rather than at a physical store, that nonetheless works out to two cars sold every minute of every hour for three days straight.
To be fair, it's a product directly endorsed by the President of the United States of America. As he said, "we have to celebrate [Musk]", especially when there's an "illegal boycott" as stated by that president. I'd be very surprised if a US president supported any company that engages in fraud, it's just unbecoming of the position.
You mean the same American president threatening to annex the country? Because they can fuck right off, if so.
I'm amazed American's don't seem to grasp this. The president is threatening annexation, and several people below them in the administration are taking it seriously. This is deeply offensive.
I'm amazed American's don't seem to grasp this. The president is threatening annexation, and several people below them in the administration are taking it seriously. This is deeply offensive.
[deleted]
You need to end with /s when it's sarcasm.
Maybe, but surely the general intelligence of the average HN commenter should be able to pick up on sarcasm / satire / parody. Unless, of course, it reflects a mirror back at them.
Not sure I fully understand the accusation. 8600 sales in a weekend is a lot for a physical store, but these happened online. What about the other stores, were they also high? It is possible this was legit but there should be an investigation. Preventing waste, fraud and abuse.
Real purchases require real people, so simply asking who the buyers are should sort it out. If employees were filling out the forms and “buying” then it should be fairly straightforward to figure out.
Real purchases require real people, so simply asking who the buyers are should sort it out. If employees were filling out the forms and “buying” then it should be fairly straightforward to figure out.
I think the Fortune article lacked background, I found more here: https://www.yahoo.com/news/tesla-43m-canadian-ev-rebate-1306...
For some reason the Canadian iZEV rebate was provided to the dealer, not the end customer. Dealers were to sell below cost and then get money back from the government, so they'd be on the hook for the difference if they couldn't get the rebate. The rebate was scheduled to cut off in March but was obviously running out of funding before schedule. Dealers had some leeway to batch their claims and Tesla sent an unprecedented number of claims right at the end that drained the remaining funds, but these claims are not necessarily all for sales from that small window. I can't find any specifics but surely the claims submitted have to substantiate that a car was sold to a Canadian resident. I'm still not sure that Tesla did anything illegal unless they are found to have sent fraudulent claims, which should be trivial to check.
For some reason the Canadian iZEV rebate was provided to the dealer, not the end customer. Dealers were to sell below cost and then get money back from the government, so they'd be on the hook for the difference if they couldn't get the rebate. The rebate was scheduled to cut off in March but was obviously running out of funding before schedule. Dealers had some leeway to batch their claims and Tesla sent an unprecedented number of claims right at the end that drained the remaining funds, but these claims are not necessarily all for sales from that small window. I can't find any specifics but surely the claims submitted have to substantiate that a car was sold to a Canadian resident. I'm still not sure that Tesla did anything illegal unless they are found to have sent fraudulent claims, which should be trivial to check.
> It is possible this was legit but there should be an investigation.
It's really not. That's Tesla saying that one-fifth of its annual sales for the entire country of Canada happened on one weekend in one part of the province of Ottawa.
It's really not. That's Tesla saying that one-fifth of its annual sales for the entire country of Canada happened on one weekend in one part of the province of Ottawa.