[untitled]
8 comments
I have heard people claim the opposite: that Chrome is the memory hog and Firefox is much leaner. I think it’s probably dependent upon usage patterns, OS and extensions.
But I think the biggest problem with Firefox is Mozilla itself. I’d love to see a group with some actual backing behind them fork Firefox and make a proper competitor unaffected by Mozilla’s poor decision-making.
But I think the biggest problem with Firefox is Mozilla itself. I’d love to see a group with some actual backing behind them fork Firefox and make a proper competitor unaffected by Mozilla’s poor decision-making.
I use Firefox since years now (on macOS + iOS) and I am very happy with the quality of the browser.
Mozilla sucks, and sucks since a decade at least now. But Firefox... no complains at all.
Mozilla sucks, and sucks since a decade at least now. But Firefox... no complains at all.
Mozilla, but yes. The very first release of firefox was awesome compared to IE.
Nowadays you have to use a fork like Libreworlf. But same with Chrome, you use ungoogled forks.
Nowadays you have to use a fork like Libreworlf. But same with Chrome, you use ungoogled forks.
Modern Firefox is a Google psyop. I still use it, though.
Yeah the whole point of Firefox existing (Google supports them or has in the past) is for Google/Chrome to avoid antitrust lawsuits.
My only hack is I wrap Firefox with a TCP_NO_DELAY lib: probably cargo culting a bit but I do feel it's even snappier that way.
P.S: main desktop is an AMD 7700X with only 32 GB of RAM. Nothing crazy.