[untitled]
6 comments
I have been developing local AI on Apple devices since 2019, and they already had great AI support via Accelerate and MPS back then. Contrast to the Windows DirectML fiasco, which was basically just finger-pointing between MS, Intel and AMD all saying “it works on my machine” for years, I would say that Apple was always far ahead and did invest where it actually mattered to developers and users.
Not sure about nailed. Much like Microsoft’s AI tools I just don’t use them.
Apple definitely had an opportunity to turn Siri into a ChatGPT/Openclaw like thing with immense user value and they just fumbled that chance.
Apple definitely had an opportunity to turn Siri into a ChatGPT/Openclaw like thing with immense user value and they just fumbled that chance.
Old Veneto saying
Ci non fa gnente, non sbaja mai
Whoever does nothing never makes mistakes.
It’s always been the Apple strategy to wait. Every Apple product has been “late” by the rest of the industry standards, because they never play early game anything. iPhone was years after the first smartphone. Features Android had came significantly later. It’s just never been the strategy to be early to any new technology.
But isn't that part of the Apple distortion field? They do seem to wait a very long time, but then when they do execute, there seems to be this air of "look what we've invented" when it's something that's been around for a long time.
For example, liquid glass.
For example, liquid glass.
Not really nailed. Siri is still awful and I'm considering moving to Android due to it, only privacy concerns stop me, not Apples AI strategy