[untitled]
7 comments
So what are you like when you’re on your medication?
> several second hand accounts have been circulating which are not accurate or are misleading.
So why are you trying to refute them with a firsthand account that is entirely anecdotal?
There's nothing we can do with this story. HN is not Penguin Random House.
So why are you trying to refute them with a firsthand account that is entirely anecdotal?
There's nothing we can do with this story. HN is not Penguin Random House.
I am a first hand account, take it or leave it.
Those accounts funded by the “secret state” you are all now practiced in denying are setting the story to psyop the American people and government into new powers of state secrecy and budgetary discretion.
There was no hellfire UFO strike, that psyop was the brainchild of Bannon and an elite ex-government intelligence spook cell intending to own these secrets for themselves.
Those accounts funded by the “secret state” you are all now practiced in denying are setting the story to psyop the American people and government into new powers of state secrecy and budgetary discretion.
There was no hellfire UFO strike, that psyop was the brainchild of Bannon and an elite ex-government intelligence spook cell intending to own these secrets for themselves.
I'm leaving it. Can you demonstrate something otherwise unbelievable that proves you are distinct from a liar? These stories are ChatGPT-tier crank material.
I leave you to dwell in the shadow of your incredulity.
You will see this unfold in time and will remember my account.
The culture of humans traveling among our minds and fooling with us is far more significant secret than they.
You will see this unfold in time and will remember my account.
The culture of humans traveling among our minds and fooling with us is far more significant secret than they.
No, please continue. What artifacts have you accumulated, what multidimensional quantum stories do you have to tell? It must all be so exciting.
If we're going to lie about reality while eschewing accountability, we might as well make it fun.
If we're going to lie about reality while eschewing accountability, we might as well make it fun.
I do have a bunch of stuff, though the economy of brevity is really the only way.
I may be wrong, misled, or “crazy”, though I am a man of truth and integrity and put myself considerably at risk accusing your ruling class of treason against humanity.
I hope you’ve read my threads. There is more spread throughout other accounts (truth is not as popular as mob appetites proclaim.) and more to come!
The qubit is a dead end, true quantum computing and a better understanding of consciousness will come through quantum holography, which is decades away.
I have a revised information theory, which states thermodynamics is a footnote of entropy rather than the other way around. And the definition of entropy (suiting information and physics) is “the existential phenomenon of potential distributing over the surface area of negative potential.
I think you will find that drops right in to the useful applications of existing frameworks (without defining a new “kind” of entropy for every additional potential or distribution or surface area.)
It isn’t that “everyone is wrong” it is that the story we tell ourselves is incorrect. It’s those “theorists” you have to watch out for, the engineers (pragmatists) had it right (application wise) all along.
I may be wrong, misled, or “crazy”, though I am a man of truth and integrity and put myself considerably at risk accusing your ruling class of treason against humanity.
I hope you’ve read my threads. There is more spread throughout other accounts (truth is not as popular as mob appetites proclaim.) and more to come!
The qubit is a dead end, true quantum computing and a better understanding of consciousness will come through quantum holography, which is decades away.
I have a revised information theory, which states thermodynamics is a footnote of entropy rather than the other way around. And the definition of entropy (suiting information and physics) is “the existential phenomenon of potential distributing over the surface area of negative potential.
I think you will find that drops right in to the useful applications of existing frameworks (without defining a new “kind” of entropy for every additional potential or distribution or surface area.)
It isn’t that “everyone is wrong” it is that the story we tell ourselves is incorrect. It’s those “theorists” you have to watch out for, the engineers (pragmatists) had it right (application wise) all along.