operator23 lets you describe a workflow in plain English and run it across your stack.
hubspot, apollo, monday, slack, google drive, others. no builder,
no if-then config.
built for 5-15 person teams. founder doing inbound triage, one ops person juggling six tools, work that should be automated keeps getting deferred because nobody has two hours to wire up zapier.
so it stays manual until someone gets hired six months later to "fix the systems" and inherits a mess.
talked to a bunch of founders and early ops hires. three things came up every time.
setup complexity. people aren't afraid of automation.
they're afraid of two hours of field mappings only to have something silently misroute.
debugging. when something breaks there's no explanation. you find out three weeks later when a customer asks why they were never followed up with. one bad experience and you're
back in spreadsheets for a year.
no trust without control. everyone wanted a review step before the system acts on its own. not forever, but until it has proven itself.
operator23 addresses all three. plain English in, setup is minutes. readable logs of every step, debugging is obvious. staged autonomy, everything starts in review and graduates as it proves itself.
when something fails the agent reads its own error and retries instead of dying silently.
the bet: the next wave of ops tools won't be configured, they'll be described.
for founders and ops hires who've lived this, does this match what you've seen, and is there a fourth problem we're missing?
0 comments
—
Show HN: Plain English automation that fixes itself when it breaks · HackerTrans
hubspot, apollo, monday, slack, google drive, others. no builder,
no if-then config.
built for 5-15 person teams. founder doing inbound triage, one ops person juggling six tools, work that should be automated keeps getting deferred because nobody has two hours to wire up zapier.
so it stays manual until someone gets hired six months later to "fix the systems" and inherits a mess.
talked to a bunch of founders and early ops hires. three things came up every time. setup complexity. people aren't afraid of automation.
they're afraid of two hours of field mappings only to have something silently misroute.
debugging. when something breaks there's no explanation. you find out three weeks later when a customer asks why they were never followed up with. one bad experience and you're back in spreadsheets for a year.
no trust without control. everyone wanted a review step before the system acts on its own. not forever, but until it has proven itself.
operator23 addresses all three. plain English in, setup is minutes. readable logs of every step, debugging is obvious. staged autonomy, everything starts in review and graduates as it proves itself.
when something fails the agent reads its own error and retries instead of dying silently.
the bet: the next wave of ops tools won't be configured, they'll be described. for founders and ops hires who've lived this, does this match what you've seen, and is there a fourth problem we're missing?