Why isn't xAI as impactful compared to others?
xai has tons of GPUs, tons of money, tons of talent pool in SF Bay Area, why isn't xAI as impactful compared to others?
8 comments
Because no one wants Elons opinions in their vibe coded app. And also that the data isnt used against ZDR or other reasons on cutting corners as XAi is more desperate than other labs.
Whether its true or not its the perception, so people avoid the model.
They've also not figured out networking Fabric yet so the models are poor
Whether its true or not its the perception, so people avoid the model.
They've also not figured out networking Fabric yet so the models are poor
is the networking fabric the reason models are poor?
I wouldn't say thats the reason they're poor. Thats the reason xAI is behind. Everyone is at varying degrees to the frontier especially with Sota. The grok model is decent
Because it’s focused on advancing Musk’s causes to the exclusion of user benefit. I want great software, great advice, great analysis. Not MAGA propaganda.
well, model adoption is one thing,
how about the model performance?
SpaceXAI is totally fine since they own the Colossus data centers which turned out to be under-utilized.
is the under utilization a tech issue? that they have not figured out? everyone else is lack of compute
It is a good problem to have. They bought too many GPUs and Grok runs on 10% of their total GPU allocation.
Meaning they have plenty of capacity to provide compute to other companies like Anthropic which there is a high demand for compute.
Meaning they have plenty of capacity to provide compute to other companies like Anthropic which there is a high demand for compute.