Conrad Barski's Haskell Tutorial(lisperati.com)

160 pointsby icey13 anni fa38 comments

http://lisperati.com/haskell/

41 comments

drcode13 anni fa

Wow, how did my Haskell tutorial get to the HN front page out of nowhere? :-)

If you like my stuff, keep an eye out for my new Bitcoin book, which will be coming out this fall. I've been slaving over the artwork for months, it should be a beautiful book! The working title is "Bitcoins for the Befuddled".

binarycrusader13 anni fa

Thanks for the wonderful Land of Lisp book!

I only wish someone would do a similar "Land of C" book some day :-)

p4bl013 anni fa

Following the naming pattern, the title would be more like "County of C" ;-).

victorf13 anni fa

I haven't read that one, and I am looking for an into to Lisp book. What did you like about it?

(and I think it would be a missed opportunity to not title it "Sea of C")

binarycrusader13 anni fa

To be clear, I haven't finished the book yet, but I made it through the first eleven chapters (~230 pages) so I think I've gone through enough material to render a reasonable opinion. With that disclaimer out of the way...

I love that the author chose to expose readers to core, foundational concepts through example programs that were continually improved instead of using lots of throwaway one-off examples.

Put differently, the author managed to ensure that readers that diligently followed through from beginning to end would gain a real sense of progression as they went through the material.

The only complaint I really have so far is Chapter 11 -- but that's not really the author's fault; that's just the terrifyingly mind-numbing formatting functionality (Common?) Lisp offers.

gcv13 anni fa

Seconding the recommendation for Land of Lisp. It's fun, well-written, and thorough. And has the most fun art I've seen in a programming manual.

I read five great books on Common Lisp.

Intro level: ANSI Common Lisp (by our very own PG), Practical Common Lisp, and Land of Lisp. Can't go wrong with any of them, but LoL has art and humor.

Advanced level: On Lisp (again, PG), and Let Over Lambda (a bit rougher around the edges, opinionated, but full of clever programming tricks).

lelf13 anni fa

Read it. How can you not read a book with such a front cover? And it has examples you really want to play with (literally), not 10000 kinds of "hello fibonacci".

icey13 anni fa

If you're genuinely curious, I found it on the Haskell subreddit today!

jaekwon13 anni fa

drcode, do you know of a Haskell implementation of bitcoind?

drcode13 anni fa

No, I have never heard of Haskell and bitcoin in the same sentence. I think you'd have to use an FFI.

dons13 anni fa

* http://hackage.haskell.org/package/network-bitcoin

* Pure coin , https://github.com/laanwj/Purecoin

* haskoin, https://github.com/bitcoin-spec/haskoin

drcode13 anni fa

Hi Don... Wow, lot's going on... I should have done a Google search before responding :-)

doublec13 anni fa

roconnor was working on one. There are git mirrors of the darcs repository on github. For example: https://github.com/laanwj/Purecoin

I don't know the current status of it.

lelf13 anni fa

> In Haskell, this type of integer can't get bigger than 2^31...

It's platform-dependent

  h> finiteBitSize (0 :: Int)
  64

> We could have used the type Integer instead- This type of integer grows "magically" and can hold any sized integer, no matter how big... but it's slower, so we used Int instead, since our numbers will never get that big.

Premature optimisation at its best.

pogden13 anni fa

In Haskell you can also use the Integral typeclass to make functions polymorphic to Int and Integer.

lelf13 anni fa

And why would you do this in simple tutorial program? Anyway, you'd need Num.

dfeltey13 anni fa

I don't know why anyone would use the Integral typeclass over just Int or Integer in a simple program like this, but you wouldn't need Num in addition to Integral, every instance of Integral must also be an instance of Real, and instances of Real must be instances of Num.

[deleted]13 anni fa

apgwoz13 anni fa

Picnicmob was a really clever idea. I think I remember that it got cancelled though, which was unfortunate.

I like the tutorial though. I'd be willing to bet it's his style and work that inspired the "Learn you a..." books. The Haskell one is great, and so is the Erlang one.

seako13 anni fa

don't forget _why's (poignant) guide to ruby http://mislav.uniqpath.com/poignant-guide/

victorf13 anni fa

I hated that book, the signal to goofy joke ratio was awful. Compare with, say, "Learn you an Erlang", which was goofy while still informative.

apgwoz13 anni fa

I've never read all of the poignant guide, though I probably should for entertainment value. But, yeah, I'd imagine that was also an inspiration.

gtani13 anni fa

My local Barnes and Noble has this book next to Felleisen et al's "Realm of Racket". These will be hours and cups of coffee well spent!

http://realmofracket.com/

gps40813 anni fa

Simple and refined, guaranteed to blow your mind...

The tao of regular expressions link is broken in the first chapter. Does anyone have a link?

reirob13 anni fa

I like the tutorial very much! Thank you! And I like the final words, which I think brings to the point the whole discussion about Haskell vs. Imperative languages:

  [..] Because the physical world changes only slightly 
  from moment to moment, it means that languages that 
  can comfortably mutate large data structures in targeted
  ways will always have a role to play in real-world
  software- The "real world" usually just doesn't work the
  way Haskell, and other functional languages would prefer
  it did: Haskell preferred that at every moment in time, a
  "new universe" would look at the "old universe" and would
  rebuild itself, from scratch, from what it saw in the
  past, with radical changes happening all the time.

  Despite its many advantages, I humbly suggest, therefore,
  that in the future there will continue to be a rift
  between the "imperative" and "functional" camps of
  programming, until someone comes up with a truly robust
  way of uniting these two camps- And I think that some
  profound programming discoveries still need to be made in
  the future before this problem is really resolved- I get
  the feeling it's just not good enough to wave at the
  problem and say "Monads".

[deleted]13 anni fa

frou_dh13 anni fa

ghc 7.6.3 (brew) installed on OS X doesn't like the first code presented (System.Random, Text.Regex and StdGen aren't found).

mietek13 anni fa

`brew install haskell-platform` should help.

[deleted]13 anni fa

(3)

izietto13 anni fa

I'm unsure which regex package flavor to use... regex-base? regex-compat? regex-pcre? regex-???

blaenk13 anni fa

This confused me when I was learning Haskell as well. The way I understand it is that regex-base defines a base-line interface -- such as the context-aware =~ function -- that all of the other packages implement, which is why they're known as 'backends' (e.g. regex-tdfa, regex-pcre, etc.).

In newer versions of GHC (> 6.6), the backends re-export this interface so that you just need to import the backend. regex-tdfa is the backend that I've used myself, mainly because I saw it used in other packages (Hakyll).

http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Regular_expressions#regex...

lelf13 anni fa

Text.Regex is provided by regex-comp. (Better install haskell platform).

monokrome13 anni fa

This website was written on a planet where 244 lines of Haskell is less than 100 lines of Haskell.

drcode13 anni fa

That's why there's a footnote on the front page:

[1] - Lines of active code only, not counting optional function signatures. Intermediate debug output lines excluded. May cause eye irritation if viewed for prolonged periods of time. Speak to your physician to find out if this tutorial is the best treatment option for you.