Look at WCAG 2 (web content accessiblity guidelines) they specify tags and elements common screen readers will understand to help make you site accessible.
update: They say they do not log anything, and pass no information upstream to the authoritative DNS server.
------
I didn't see anything in the announcement about logging or other privacy related questions. The FAQ also didn't list this information.
The only thing they mention about privacy is how a dns request to them is protected, but not what they do with the data.
Did I miss something?
-------
Reading their privacy policy:
>We do not collect anything for tracking purposes and take all necessary technical, administrative and physical measures to protect the information we get.
>When AdGuard DNS user tries to visit a page, our server receives following information:
User’s IP-address;
DNS request which contains domain name.
>The DNS request will be forwarded to a root or authoritative DNS server, but for the upstream server it looks as if this request is originated from AdGuard DNS server, there is absolutely no way for them to identify the original user. We, in our turn, do not log or save any of this information.
The only reason they spend that on advertising is because of their ROI. The people funding the super pacs aren't just giving their money away without some kind of return.
The difference between the two is one I can choose to avoid, the other is affecting who chooses my rights and laws with less focus on the people affected by those decisions and more on the affect to those funding their campaigns.
> Also, why do the state dem AG's always suing to enforce new laws instead of the legislation process, it seems like the new way to pass laws is to get a judge to give it to you. We have legal weed from legislation now.
I agree with your position, but it's not just Dems. This is the main point of my comment also, this should be done with legislation.
I think the FCC is trying to remove that ability from States now because federal law overrules state law.
> The Attorneys General are hardly alone on this one. As Reuters notes, Mozilla, Vimeo and Etsy also joined forces today to file a legal challenge, while governors in six states have signed executive orders and three states have passed their own net neutrality laws.
The system seems broken when states representing more than 50% of the population have to sue in court to try to change something like this. Instead with that much backing it should be done through the legislative branch. I'm concerned about the growing use of courts to try to decide policies because our legislative bodies can't work together and instead just try to force one sided issues through or block each other.
> Together, the AGs represent states totaling 165 million people — more than half of the U.S. population.
This is a really good resource: https://accessibility.18f.gov/
A lot of frameworks now have some accessiblity built in if you add the correct attributes.