You're probably just responding to the headline but this person is an AI bull and isn't claiming it's a big deal, she's going into it and explaining it.
I think the parent's point is that if you are genuinely open to losing, the arguments can be productive because you can learn something instead... So stopping arguments is just another way of closing yourself off.
Terrible zero value article, I am extremely surprised it is upvoted.
That being said Artificial Analysis just came out with a brand new benchmark where it scored between opus 4.8 and gpt-5.5 and well behind fable-5 so it's definitely frontier-ish https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2067744637155226101
This is really held back by one bench (omniscience accuracy) where it's really very far behind otherwise i think it's got at least a couple of points higher.
Kimi 2.5 has the best long context. For raw coding benchmark scores you can just post train on top of it with more specialized data. 2.5 is kinda old, 2.6 is the current release which is exactly just that and catches up to the frontier in most aspects.
Do people like "gacha"? I thought people played games for the game experience, story, etc, and the gacha is just the monetization mechanic. It's like making a big deal out of paying $20 bucks a month, or buying loads of DLCs for example.
SOTA MRCR (or would've been a few hours earlier... beaten by 5.5), I've long thought of this as the most important non-agentic benchmark, so this is especially impressive. Beats Opus 4.7 here
Might be sticking with 4.6 it's only been 20 minutes of using 4.7 and there are annoyances I didn't face with 4.6 what the heck. Huge downgrade on MRCR too....
Well they're not public yet so you'll have to put up with rumors. But the numbers are available for companies like DeepSeek say they have an 80% profit margin, so it stands to reason OAI etc would do similar numbers considering they charge much more.