HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

Nezteb

no profile record

Submissions

Another GitHub outage in the same day

githubstatus.com
375 points·by Nezteb·5 mesi fa·283 comments

The von Neumann bottleneck is impeding AI computing?

research.ibm.com
61 points·by Nezteb·10 mesi fa·32 comments

comments

Nezteb
·5 mesi fa·discuss
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_apples

Immoral boot-licking human engineers are indistinguishable from LLMs.
Nezteb
·5 mesi fa·discuss
> it's also accelerating digital UBI

Do you have sources for this claim?
Nezteb
·6 mesi fa·discuss
> So Wikipedia is corrupt as per usual. Grokipedia's article is significantly less biased and more accurate.

I hope this was sarcasm.
Nezteb
·10 mesi fa·discuss
I thought so too, although treating everything as data and functions is really nice [1].

Regarding the BEAM and why Gleam has a separate library for actors: [2]

> "One notable difference between Elixir and Gleam is that Elixir gets to just re-use the OTP code as-is (with some Elixir wrappers on top for convenience). Gleam concluded that the OTP is built expecting dynamic types, and that for best results in Gleam they'd need to re-implement the key primitives. That's why the example shown is an "Actor" not a GenServer - it serves the same purpose, and might even fit in a Supervision tree, but isn't actually a GenServer."

There's a brief snippet mentioning this in the Gleam OTP readme as well: [3]

> "Actors do not yet support all OTP system messages, so some of the OTP debugging APIs may not be fully functional."

[1] https://mckayla.blog/posts/all-you-need-is-data-and-function...

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40645489

[3] https://github.com/gleam-lang/otp#limitations-and-known-issu...
Nezteb
·3 anni fa·discuss
The only suggestion I've seen that would make some sense is Section 174: https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/the-pulse-75