Keep in mind this is a great primer on macroeconomics, or how the economies and money supplies of societies as a whole work.
It's equally fascinating and important to learn about the basics of microeconomics, the other side of that coin (pun intended), or how individual people and businesses make decisions about production and consumption. You've probably heard of the laws of supply and demand which are really important for understanding things like how and why prices change and why some businesses and industries are more successful than others.
Nice post Ryan, and especially, nice use of Trello. Do you also have a Trello board for your Treehouse team or do you use just TeamGantt? It would be interesting to read a post about your tools at Treehouse.
This is very interesting. I mentor at both 500 Startups and i/o Ventures who have accelerator programs. I know a high percentage have gone on to funding, and a number of happy exits. (Not Instagram exits, but great first experiences for the founders). I can't speak if these are still the exception and not the norm though.
Whether you're a windows developer, a mac developer, a web developer, an app developer, or working for any other kind of software-based business you are putting some of your eggs in someone else's basket.
That's why I'm a composer! I love playing with notes and finding new combinations and seeing how people react to them, preferably in a deeply emotional way.
You forgot to mention a very important feature: You can use regular expressions in ranges too, and thus for example use .,/^$/d to kill the rest of the paragraph (or .,/^$/c to change the rest of the paragraph).
Yammer is a way for mid-sized businesses to make themselves feel cool while undermining their internal data security; in the wrong hands it can undo all the work of a whole world of corporate controls and make company data subject to tampering by anybody's close friend or casual acquaintance.
Having been exposed to 4 different Yammer networks, I can see why most dp pros find it a gross interference with their job and not worthy of inclusion in any real plan for internal communication.
A pediatrician is a doctor for kids you moron!!!
And quite frankly, if you're worried about possibly having a kid in school pictured with a school dinner because a paedophile might get off on it, I can only imagine that you must be absolute panic over all the advertisements for family holidays in Butlins and such....
I know, to allay your fears, perhaps we should keep all children locked up in darkened rooms and let nobody see them until they reach the age of 18, that should keep them safe I guess (unless of course the parents decide to abuse them, oopps)
The fact is, paedophiles are the problem, and photos of kids are not the cause of their paedophilia, they're just very sick people, and whether there are photos on the web or not won't change them or what they do
This is absolutely unconscionable. I hope to God that people read this and comprehend how devastating this could be, if pulled from Maya, and other children who rely on this as their (near) sole means of communication. I will share this info profusely! I wish you the best in your endeavors to keep this app alive!
I've found that I spend more than a day tweaking my setup - I generally tweak mine once a week. Not huge changes, just useful settings in Vim, or new plug ins and whatnot.How are you getting the angled colors in your Tmux status line?
I think you’re mis-interpreting his blogpost based on your own biases. The “dysfunctional patent system” is probably a comment on the organizational problems of the USPTO (i.e. it being understaffed and overloaded) rather than any inherent flaws in the patent system itself (e.g. what many think of the on-going patent lawsuit war). From what I’ve seen, judges and jurists tend to accept that the patent system is practically sound, and any complaints they make about it tend to be about the bureaucracy and inefficiencies of the USPTO. Especially since this judge is a very strong supporter of capitalism (in the linked blog itself), I’d guess that he’s also a strong supporter of intellectual property rights.
Hi, as many direct shortcuts exists as alternative way to switch bufffers or window like C-w C-v to split vertically, changing tabs with :tabn isn’t really acceptable. I suggest adding that typing gt and gT to go back and forth is simply better
Good debate, and at the end, if u plan to write software for ppl to use, then consider use heroku, if u plan to work on hardware site like heroku company, then learning those manage and slove problem skill.one last thing is, it still not bad to learn those skill, after all, it's a knowledge
One of the best short articles ever to grace these pages. Absolutely right on, on every account. Thank you, Abbie, Raymond, and Bruce. Don't ever stop teaching these vital lessons for innovative success.
The question is, do people think that this is the nature of community? There is a possible universe (possible with respect to my current logical uncertainty) in which communities are necessarily reliant on vigilance to survive. There is also a possible universe where there are fundamentally stable solutions to this problem. In such a universe, a community can survive the introduction of many malicious or misguided users because its dynamics are good rather than because its moderator is vigilant. I strongly, strongly suspect that we live in the second universe. If we do, I think trying to solve this problem is important (fostering intelligent discourse is more important than the sum of all existing online communities). I don't mean saying "lets try and change karma in this way and see what happens;" I mean saying, "lets try and describe some properties that would be desirable for the dynamics of the community to satisfy and then try and implement a system which provably satisfies them."
Amazing. I guess this will become the latest trend to take the focus off obscene payouts to CEOs. If turning down $75 million is good, why not turn down $300 million? Why not make it a billion? Reminds me of people who actually think the government is giving them money when they get their tax refunds..
So if I have the scheme correct, a CEO is paid $100 million but turns down $50 million, which becomes the story, and the CEO becomes the good guy, not the greedy guy. Rather than confiscating $100 million from the shareholders he is generously giving back $50 million. Seriously, how dumb do they think we are?
I can't think of any significant event in American history regarding airplane crashes, either, so this should work perfectly.