Even online, there are many meta-journalist columns that attempt to offer added analysis and investigative reporting. One of the issues online is, of course, finding these sources, which are often more hidden than The Economist (a London magazine founded in 1843). Columbia Journalism Review (http://www.cjr.org/) is a rare institutional effort to do this.
While in-depth (or at least, accurate) analysis should be key to ALL journalism, many newspapers have strayed from, well, their local roots. Offering detailed analysis of local events (aka serving a niche market), as opposed to competing with major online blogs or The Economist, may breathe life into the printing press not to mention the newspaper website.
I entered my PhD in 2003 (remember, it was after a kinda big crash). I beat out 160 candidates to get one of seven slots. Since then, like many junior scholars, I've been watching faculty retirement stats for new jobs. Now, I'm finishing my dissertation, and here we are. I hope to either help create a cool start-up or pray for a faculty position in 2010.
Oddly, PhDComics is one thing that's kept us going.
Wow, it's like they've skipped Open Courseware all together-- way to kick some MIT ass. Sadly, don't think this is going to match YouTube edutainment favorite: Drunk History (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V_DsL1x1uY)
Wow! comparing Palin to Chester Allen Arthur, BURN!
While I don't know how Obama would come out ("qualified" or "unqualified") in a Lessig-style analysis (which is, more or less, just a rhetorical style), this talk shows some pitfalls of one-to-one comparison. One pitfall being that Lessig's Power Point format (something he's carried over from his Free Culture lectures) glosses over what one DID as Senator, Mayor, Secretary of War, etc. These are titles (just like Major, Congressperson, VP) but the eras and jobs have changed.
Also, in saying that Palin is "qualified" or "unqualified," Lessig (slyly, but brilliantly) does what he seems to rail against: classifying a political figure into a pass/no-pass binary through a series of soundbites.
This post shows how someone can use profiles to filter and experiment in Google Analytics, which is super cool. I love Analytics (sexy maps, pretty graphs, easy to access) but it's still important to know how to interpret and discuss the data beyond the Analytics page. I'm enamored with my Dashboard, but most non-techies (aka potential investors) don't care how many filters I have. Learning what you need from Analytics and how to explain that data to a broad audience is key. Metrics rock, but they need a context beyond the dashboard.
Success also can be measured in ways other than downloads. I don't think Google is trying to "corner the browser market" by getting everyone to switch to Chrome. Rather, this could be another Google attempt to manipulate the course of future web development. The fact that there's now an omnibar for Firefox (http://scalarmotion.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/omnibar-for-fir...) indicates Chrome's influential success.
CHEAP TRICK: Buy staple foods that'll keep. Pasta, canned tuna, canned veggies, tomatoes, beans and rice rarely go bad. For good cheap protein, try preparing eggs (not only scrambled or hard-boiled, but use them in egg salads, green salads or in pasta recipes.) Also, check out: http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/07/30/16-ways-to-eat-....
CHEAP DINNER: Because I have no patience and often forget to eat, I've figured out a cheap, filling lasagna-type
1) Prepare favorite pasta (penne works well)
2)Heat some marinara sauce, can or jar is fine.
3)Once the sauce starts to boil, reduce heat and add 1/2 C to 3/4 C cottage cheese to sauce (works like ricotta).
4)If you prefer, spoon cottage cheese over hot pasta and cover with heated marinara, then microwave or bake briefly to warm cheese. This adds a nice layer of melty cheese.
(Cover plate of pasta, cheese and marinara with shredded mozzarella and bake at 425 for 9-12 min. if you want to be fancy and cheap.)
This is a great post because it helps evaluate the very different goals of various organizations. That is, it shows that the "products" of large institutions (government, higher-ed, corporate firms) are not necessarily those of smaller businesses (start-ups, boutiques, small non-profits). It also helps us consider what exactly "failing" is (it has very different meanings if you're a hacking in your free time or applying for a CS PhD, even if the output is very similar).
So, in short, one man's "useless paper," may be another's inspiration. I'm not saying all products are the same, but it's important to evaluate context and think carefully about the complexity of a product's "worth." I mean, finding value (or being able to extract value) from "junk" is a goal for most entrepreneurs.
This is a nice interview and left me feeling warm and fuzzy about being a more altruistic capitalist. But, I'm still wondering what exactly Hamilton's extended business plan was. "Selflessly Make Helpful Tool" + "Patience" still doesn't lead easily to finding investors, let alone getting rich.
One hundred years ago Manhattan's population was around 2.3 million. In the 1800s, there were still cattle drives near Broadway. These images are a reminder of how much culture and technology can change in just a few decades.
Note: All one needs to succeed in life is a blogspot page named after an adverb. Other possibilities include: "indeed," "nonetheless," "meanwhile," and "obnoxiously."
I've been messing with domain names using the word "green" and I'm just amazed they were able to get something that's 2 syllables with "green" in it. Thanks cybersquatters!
The browser is amazingly fast, clean, well-designed (great Omnibox) but the comic-book-style explanation... really? That little digitomb took away whatever load-time I would have saved the rest of the week.