Usually the but me a coffee button is there because there are people that asks for it. Like, they do want to give you something, and often they ask you for a way to do so.
That button is for them, for those who want that button, if you don't just ignore it! Nothing bad will happen and the author is (usually) not expecting anything.
Mi primer lenguaje de programación fue Logo (el de la tortuga) en español. Estuvo bien para aprender, y puede que ahí sí tenga algo de sentido, permite que los niños entiendan mejor lo que están haciendo, incluso si el inglés les cuesta.
Para ámbitos más profesionales coincido con el resto de comentarios: un único idioma (y el inglés ganó la batalla) es preferible.
If we follow the same logic.
If today is may 2026, and you want to do something "next September", are you referring to september 2027? After all, months are also grouped in years.
The fact that "next [X]day" skips the one on the current week is arbitrary, and probably more confusing than if it didn't. If people you are talking to understands that, go on, but otherwise keep in mind that "next [X]day" is confusing and you should clarify or say it differently
Similar with salary. If you want a raise, you need to ask for it. It's sad, but that's what it is. (I'm aware of some companies that do raise the salary annually, and there is also the performance benefit if you have it, but I don't think that's common).
That, and the "you need to change companies frequently (at most one each year)" are the two things I always say to people on a computer science career.
> Letting an LLM write for you is like paying somebody to work out for you.
This. This is the big distinction. If you like something and/or want to improve it, you do it yourself. If not, you pay someone else to do it. And I think that's ok.
But I guess some people either choose a wrong job or had no other option. I'm happy to not be in that group.
As a forced mac user at work (always used windows or Linux) the number of modifier keys is really confusing. On pc you use control almost for anything, alt for very special cases (when usually control is already taken) and the windows/meta key for os-related things.
On mac a lot of shortcuts use command, but some use control, and there are a bunch that use option without a real reason why, my memory really suffers from this.
The only common thing between the two is that the fn key is only used for the special modifiers under F1-F12.
I was given a magic keyboard, and my plan was to replace it with a standard one, but then I found about the keys mapping from Karabiner, and the fn key is exactly at the control position...so I started remapping.
Now, I can do almost everything with fn+key. Fn+c=command+c, fn+s=control+s and so on.
I've joined local groups for anime and videogames, but they are mostly anime. Videogames and programming seems to be almost exclusively masculine (the stereotypes are there for a reason) but the few girls there doesn't seem much different.
Maybe I've had bad luck, maybe I need to search more, but still...the situation seems to be similar everywhere.
That women feel pressured to be introverted and/or man feel pressured to be extroverted. Being the opposite is a handicap.
Although, the good part, is that the personality doesn't seems to be genetic and doesn't come from your parents either, otherwise we would be extinct (literally).
Unfortunately, this situation makes me think about genre issues in an different way, not only sort of understanding why they happen, but surprised that it's not more common. I've met very horrid persons, that have achieve what I haven't, just because women doesn't seem to try to see past them. Is like they gave up...
As someone who identifies with the text, a very introverted guy that almost never starts a conversation but it's able to maintain it once they other person starts it, and as someone who has never dated any girl (and failed to do so) I'll just say: almost every random person that talks with me...is a man.
It doesn't seems...fair...and, again, says a lot about society.
I was in a similar situation in 2021, and my requirements were small size, no notch and headphone jack. I didn't like Samsung (the android from Samsung is fundamentally different from the other androids) and wanted to avoid xiaomi and other similar brands due to the ads bloatware.
The size requirement was basically impossible, but I switched it to a width requirement instead, and I found the Sony Xperia 10 III.
Pros: One of the smallest widths, no notch, jack, and a minor modified android (no stock, but pretty close).
Cons: too tall (but at least the small width makes it a easier to use with one hand), medium-bad camera (for some reason, although I don't care) and some preinstalled apps (like Facebook, but you can remove/disable them with adb).
Overall I'm pretty happy with it, and I'm considering another Xperia as a replacement if this one starts to fail (more than 4 years now, but still fine)
I like this analogy, and in fact in have used it for a totally different reason: why I don't like AI.
Imagine someone going to a local gym and using an exosqueleton to do the exercises without effort. Able to lift more? Yes. Run faster? Sure. Exercising and enjoying the gym? ... No, and probably not.
I like writing code, even if it's boilerplate. It's fun for me, and I want to keep doing it. Using AI to do that part for me is just...not fun.
Someone going to the gym isn't trying to lift more or run faster, but instead improving and enjoying. Not using AI for coding has the same outcome for me.
I learned this when a coworker mentioned this to me. Turns out I was doing it without knowing it was a thing! Of course I continue doing it, but it's good to have a short and clear name to give others (specially those that only seem to follow concepts if they have a flashy name)
If you have the expression 1+2*3 you have three elements with two operands. You need to choose a rule to pick one of them first.
In mathematics, the rule is "*/ then +-" and then from left to right. This means that usually first you do 2*3, then 1+.
But what if you do want to make 1+2 first?
There is another alternative, parenthesis. Those mean "do the thing inside first" so (1+2)*3 changes the precedence and now you do 1+2 first, then *3
The post is asking: with parenthesis you can increase the precedence of operations. What if you could decrease it?
Let's use «» as another operand (the blog uses parenthesis, but that makes it really confusing) this operand means "do the thing inside last". So the expression 1+«2*3» means "do 1+ first, then 2*3.
The issue is...this doesn't make sense, what the blog is really saying is to reduce the precedence of operators. Think the expression 1+2«*»3 or 1+2(*)3 and now the rule is "the parenthesized operators have one precedence less" so 1+2(*)3=(1+2)*3
I personally use Google forms for a very similar feature. You don't even need to display the google form itself, you can create your own and then perform a fetch.
I even have it connected to a google sheet and google scripts, to send me emails for entries matching some patterns.
Heavily depends on Google, yes, but for something free that honestly I won't care if stops working (like a prototype) I'm ok with it.
I like icons (and colors, but those are still mostly missing) to quickly find a frequent action. If the menu is always the same you can learn the position, but with dynamic entries it's way more difficult.
If I write actions/setup-python@v1, I'm expecting the action to run with the v1 tag of that repository. If I rerun it, I expect it to run with the v1 tag of that repository...which I'm aware may not be the same if the tag was updated.
If I instead use actions/setup-python@27b31702a0e7fc50959f5ad993c78deac1bdfc29 then I'm expecting the action to run with that specific commit. And if I run it again it will run with the same commit.
So, whether you choose the tag or the commit depends on whether you trust the repository or not, and if you want automatic updates. The option is there...isn't it?
That button is for them, for those who want that button, if you don't just ignore it! Nothing bad will happen and the author is (usually) not expecting anything.