HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

__jambo

no profile record

Submissions

Ask HN: Can you be a naive scientist AND a ruthless businessman?

2 points·by __jambo·2 anni fa·0 comments

Ask HN: Could we just re-invent original Google?

24 points·by __jambo·2 anni fa·37 comments

Ask HN: Why was Elon Musk forced to buy Twitter?

12 points·by __jambo·3 anni fa·20 comments

Ask HN: How many are using LLMs for messaging friends?

2 points·by __jambo·3 anni fa·1 comments

comments

__jambo
·2 anni fa·discuss
in 1950 in the book "the human use of human beings", the famous mathematician Norbert Weiner pointed out your exact sentiment. Complaining that instead of solving problems, or doing anything new or interesting, people were using these "computing machines" to increase the efficiency of the parts of the capitalist machine that caused the problems in the first place.

Nobody listened, and nothing has changed.
__jambo
·2 anni fa·discuss
I think this calls for a government funded national un-enshittification Laboratory to study the social dynamics of enshittification and develop hygiene practices. Work must be done quickly before enshittification research becomes enshittified!
__jambo
·2 anni fa·discuss
Nah this tech will poison the web. People don't know what it is and take it too seriously.
__jambo
·2 anni fa·discuss
I think the problem is then you eventually get SEOification. I suppose you can just reset every now and again. Maybe like give a training program to get SEO people real jobs.
__jambo
·2 anni fa·discuss
> Hollywood has.. hard power

Um, what??
__jambo
·3 anni fa·discuss
This is a clearly false collection of arbitrary useless and arrogant opinions. See any famous reclusive intellectual or writer for counterexamples.
__jambo
·3 anni fa·discuss
Because this is so depressing I am going to try think of positive aspects:

The flip side to this is the government had power because these activities required enormous resources. Perhaps it will go the other direction, if there is less of a moat other players can enter. Eg all it takes to make a state is a bunch of cheap drones and the latest government bot according to your philosophy.

Maybe it means government will massively shrink in personelle? Maybe we can have a completely open source ai government/legal system. Lawyers kind of suck ethically anyway, so maybe it would be better? With low barrier to entry, we can rapidly prototype such governments and trial them on smaller populations like iceland. Such utopias will be so good everyone will move there.

They still have to have physical prisons, if everyone is in prison this will be silly, but I suppose they can fine everyone, not so different from lowering wages which they already do.
__jambo
·3 anni fa·discuss
Great idea.
__jambo
·3 anni fa·discuss
Sam's sad face in the NYT article is pretty priceless.
__jambo
·3 anni fa·discuss
"...Google and tech industry allies responded with a massive lobbying campaign... convince lawmakers banning targeted ads would hurt the global economy. The gambit worked, and the draft law no longer threatens Google’s advertising."

Lol, sounds like Google and the tech industry used targeted advertising to prevent a ban on targeted advertising.