HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

aegis4244

no profile record

comments

aegis4244
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Many, close to most of the "have-nots" just voted to help the "haves" at great cost to themselves. The economic decline across fly over states isn't going to stop. It's going to continue. Resulting in those angry uneducated voters to double down. Those old factory jobs are gone. Unlikely to come back in our or our children's lifetime. They are ideologically opposed to education. Leading to more of the same, just more so. Economically, politically, and educatively.
aegis4244
·12 mesi fa·discuss
You can. There are extensions and scripts for exactly that. I never use the app, only browse via the web, even on mobile, just with a user agent switcher.
aegis4244
·anno scorso·discuss
Bedtime Math. My kids loved it.

https://www.amazon.com/Bedtime-Math/s?k=Bedtime+Math
aegis4244
·anno scorso·discuss
My partner and I did exactly that. She let me choose. Ended up with the surname from one of my favorite literary characters. Changed my first name to match as well. Happened to be a childhood nick name anyway, so I've always answered to it.
aegis4244
·2 anni fa·discuss
Is that a double negative in your title ? Or is it an inside joke I didn't get ?
aegis4244
·2 anni fa·discuss
Economists say every immigrant is a net economic positive to the nation. They eat,buy food clothing, cars. Every immigrant child is a net negative to the state,at least until they turn 18. But it isn't even. Net neg per kid of maybe 800 a year, positive of each adult of 1200-1600 are the numbers I've heard on freakonomics podcast. Their guests proposed solution was to have the feds pay the states per an immigrant child to offset who bears the costs. I don't think it's even a debatable position that each immigrant is a net economic positive, in the long term. Some political groups worrying about losing their culture is a completely different kettle of fish.

https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/north-american-century/b...