1) They are good developers, but they are employees. They want a fixed salary, a calm life, and just to be told what to work on not have to take ownership of something. Being a dev is different then being a CTO/Co-Founder. We've tried building startups internally, doesn't work out well, always last priority.
2) The developers are good, really good actually, but are they S-tier, 10x devs, no. And I strongly believe you need that.
Had never seen this before, a documented and logical approach to evaluating information. Wonder if a review platform could be made where they summarize all of the review information using the CRAAP filter.
The best way I have found to evaluate online reviews has been to focus on the 2-3 star ratings that have actual rationale and logic behind their negative review.
Then evaluate if the reason that the reviewer did not enjoy the product, service, or experience is a deal-breaker for me or if it’s a tradeoff that I can live with
You see, what might be a turn-off for someone else might actually a plus for me.
The thing is that this just covers a subsection of online purchases, you can't use it to value a hotel for example right?
The concept though is 1000% valid, we need a review platform that somewhat guarantees, verifies and vets all reviews that it displays.
Maybe, instead of anybody publishing a review, it's this central entity that has a due diligence team that crafts a review. And instead of making money from the affiliate links to the products sites, they make money from people paying to read the verified reviews.
1) They are good developers, but they are employees. They want a fixed salary, a calm life, and just to be told what to work on not have to take ownership of something. Being a dev is different then being a CTO/Co-Founder. We've tried building startups internally, doesn't work out well, always last priority.
2) The developers are good, really good actually, but are they S-tier, 10x devs, no. And I strongly believe you need that.