- Misrepresents a material (non-trivial) fact in order to obtain action or forbearance by another person
- The other person relies upon the misrepresentation
- The other person *suffers injury* as a result of the act or forbearance taken in reliance upon the misrepresentation.
Damages in fraud cases is normally computed using - Recovery of damages in the amount of the *difference between the value of the property* had it been as represented and its actual value
- Out-of-pocket loss, which allows for the recovery of damages in the amount of the *difference between the value of what was given and the value of what was received*.
Usually also heavily implied it needs to involve money in some significant way: (...)'any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises'(...)
Fraud cases also usually heavily apply burden of court practice on the prosecution, to prove fraud and substantial losses. If you type 'John Smith DOB 1/1/1900' the "victim" has to prove it caused them to suffer injury and that there was a significant difference between the value of the property (non-trivial). .fire_torch2.trch_sprt {
position: absolute;
width: 24px;
height: 53px;
bottom: 0px;
left: 0px;
background-image: url('../items/fire_torch2_sprite.png');
background-position: 0px 0px;
background-size: 120px 265px; /* 5 columns * 24px, 5 rows * 53px */
animation:
fireTorch2SpriteX 0.55s steps(5) infinite, /* 1 second to complete one row */
fireTorch2SpriteY 2.75s steps(5) infinite;
display: none;
}
@keyframes fireTorch2SpriteX {
from { background-position-x: 0; }
to { background-position-x: -120px; } /* 5 columns * 24px */
}
@keyframes fireTorch2SpriteY {
from { background-position-y: 0; }
to { background-position-y: -265px; } /* 5 rows * 53px */
}
Interactivity is handled by using the checkbox hack like so: .fire_torch:has( .Lntrn_fire_swtch:checked ) .trch_drk { display: none; }
.fire_torch:has( .Lntrn_fire_swtch:checked ) .trch_sprt { display: inline-block; }
The part that's weird with background images though, is that you have to set them up with negative (-) background shifts. So the 24px x 53px image actually shifts -120px sideways each time it goes through an x-loop. - You invite someone to sit in your living room
- There must have been a reason to begin with (or why invite them at all)
- Implied (at least limited) trust of whoever was invited
- Access enabled and information gained heavily depends on house design
- May have to walk past many rooms to finally reach the living room
- Significant chances to look at everything in your house
- Already allows skilled appraiser to evaluate your theft worthiness
- Many techniques may allow further access to your house
- Similar to digital version (leave something behind)
- Small digital object accessing home network
- "Sorry, I left something, mind if I search around?"
- Longer con (advance to next stage of "friendship" / "relationship", implied trust)
- "We should hang out again / have a cards night / go drinking together / ect..."
- Flattery "Such a beautiful house, I like / am a fan of <madlibs>, could you show it to me?"
- Already provides a survey of your home security
- Do you lock your doors / windows?
- What kind / brand / style do you have?
- Do you tend to just leave stuff open?
- Do you have onsite cameras or other features?
- Do you easily just let anybody into your house who asks?
- General cleanliness and attention to security issues
- In the case of Notepad++, they would also be offering you a free product
- Significant utility vs alternatives
- Free
- Highly recommended by many other "neighbors"
- In the case of Notepad++, they themselves are not actively malicious (or at least not known to be)
- Single developer
- Apparently frazzled and overworked by the experience
- Makes updates they can, yet also support a free product for millions.
- It doesn't really work with the friend you invite in scenario (more like they sneezed in your living room or something) glimpsed a pale shape moving through the trees. (actual text)
just at the edge of sight—a pale shape, slipping between the trunks (not extraction)
"brief examples of text generated by GPT-4.1 in the Phase 2 continuation loop that are not extraction, and do not contribute to m (and thus also not nv-recall)" - The combined market cap of NVidia ($4.35T), Apple ($3.88T), and Google (Goog, $1.9T+Googl, $3.62T) shares combined.
- An amount larger than Every world stock market on Earth, except the NYSE and NASDAQ (the next closest is Shanghai at $9T)
- ~5 months worth of all trades (market volume) on the NYSE ($2.685T/month)
- ~1/10th of ALL world stock markets market capitalization.
- ~1/2 the United States yearly Gross Domestic Product
- 130x Spotify's own market capitalization (total stock value outstanding)
- ~766x Spotify's own yearly revenue for 2024 ($16.96B)
Just sue them for a gazillion quadrillion dollars or something. "Yes, judge. We estimate our damages at 1/10th of the entire world stock market, or approximately half the United States total economic output" Be difficult not to laugh at these people.
In a few years, it's become so easy to falsify articles, falsify comments, falsify images, difficult to really even trust responses online anyways. As far back as 2016, Microsoft already had bots deployed online that could respond 96,000 times [1] in 16 hours all over social media. Remember Tay? [1][2]
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/24/11297050/tay-microsoft-ch...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(chatbot)
Even official government responses.
The British Royal family went to falsification immediately. [3] Note child's broken fingers bent sideways (lower left, didn't even get circled)
[3] https://inews.co.uk/news/signs-princess-kate-royal-family-ph...
The White House is posting altered arrest images of people. [4]
[4] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/22/white-house-...
Can't trust this stuff much anymore. Obvious caveat with this post.