HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

b10c

no profile record

Submissions

Matching Hashes: Reproducing the Guix-Built Bitcoin Core Release Binary with Nix

b10c.me
43 points·by b10c·2 mesi fa·0 comments

Bitcoin Mining Centralization in 2025

b10c.me
1 points·by b10c·anno scorso·0 comments

Mining Pool Game Theory During Forks

b10c.me
29 points·by b10c·2 anni fa·2 comments

Disclosure: Wasting ViaBTC's 60 EH/s hashrate by sending a P2P message

b10c.me
2 points·by b10c·2 anni fa·0 comments

LinkingLion: An entity linking Bitcoin transactions to IPs?

b10c.me
2 points·by b10c·3 anni fa·0 comments

Monitoring Taproot Activation (2021)

b10c.me
1 points·by b10c·4 anni fa·0 comments

Extracting the Private Key from Schnorr Signatures That Reuse a Nonce

b10c.me
2 points·by b10c·4 anni fa·0 comments

Schnorr Basics

bitcoin-dev.blog
2 points·by b10c·5 anni fa·0 comments

Userspace, Statically Defined Tracing Support for Bitcoin Core

b10c.me
1 points·by b10c·5 anni fa·0 comments

Show HN: Bitcoin Core monitoring via an eBPF and USDT based Prometheus exporter

bitcoind.observer
8 points·by b10c·5 anni fa·0 comments

On anyone-can-spend Pay-to-Taproot outputs before activation

b10c.me
32 points·by b10c·5 anni fa·63 comments

Miningpool.observer – Transparency for Bitcoin Mining Pool Transaction Selection

miningpool.observer
1 points·by b10c·5 anni fa·0 comments

Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 Released

lists.linuxfoundation.org
2 points·by b10c·6 anni fa·0 comments

comments

b10c
·5 anni fa·discuss
Yes! Will be on umbrel eventually. Currently needs a Bitcoin Core build from the master branch. The features use should be in the upcoming release. Then Umbrel!
b10c
·5 anni fa·discuss
I've build a tool to detect differences between _my local_ mempool and what miners include in their block (there will always be slight differences). This is primarily intended to detect censorship, but can also detect transactions that never entered _my_ mempool.

See https://miningpool.observer
b10c
·5 anni fa·discuss
There is no single leader in Bitcoin.
b10c
·5 anni fa·discuss
The "stepping back", as mentioned in the title, doesn't summarize what's happening here. laanwj decided to delegate some of his lead maintainer tasks to others with aim to further improve the decentralization and reducing the attack surface. He want to continue to work on Bitcoin an Bitcoin Core.

Most recently, this became relevant as the bitcoincore.org website he (co-)maintains received a legal letter from a (fraudulent; as in unproven and repeatedly lying) entity claiming copyright of the 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper. He complied[0] by taking the PDF down from bitcoincore.org and received a lot of slack for it by parts of the community. He then made clear that he'll happily continue to work on Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin in general, but will not be a "martyr"[1] for the project: "it's up to you as bitcoiners to protect it". As a reaction a lot of community members and companies proceeded to host the PDF on their site [2].

[0]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/740

[1]: https://twitter.com/orionwl/status/1352181235766988800

[2]: https://twitter.com/hashtag/BitcoinPDF