batels

This works well as a personal system.

The cases I’ve been thinking about are team-level recurring tasks, where execution and ownership need to be visible beyond a single person.

batels

6 mesi fadiscuss

That makes sense.

Did it still feel lightweight enough for very small, administrative routine tasks?

batels

6 mesi fadiscuss

That makes sense.

I’ve mostly been thinking about lower visibility recurring tasks that don’t always make it onto a board.

batels

6 mesi fadiscuss

Agreed, cron + email is very effective.

The only thing I’ve seen missing sometimes is an explicit acknowledgement, so later you don’t have to rely on memory.

batels

6 mesi fadiscuss

I agree this works well for one-off or high-signal tasks.

Where I’ve personally seen friction is with recurring, low-visibility work.

Things people fully intend to do, but that don’t produce immediate feedback.

batels

6 mesi fadiscuss

Strongly agree. Automation is the ideal outcome whenever possible.

What I keep running into is the gray area between "can’t be automated yet" and "shouldn’t be automated". Things like reviews, checks, approvals, or manual verifications.

The notification fatigue point is especially real. If everything notifies, nothing gets attention.

Do you usually treat non-automatable tasks as exceptions, or do you still rely on routines / trust for those?