HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

boldpandabear

no profile record

Submissions

UK Study shows more Covid deaths amongst vaccinated

chriswaldburger.substack.com
1 points·by boldpandabear·5 anni fa·0 comments

Ask HN: Do virus mutations break the laws of thermodynamics?

1 points·by boldpandabear·5 anni fa·3 comments

Spanish Flu Spread

medium.com
1 points·by boldpandabear·5 anni fa·0 comments

Is it Covid or fear of Covid that kills?

docs.google.com
2 points·by boldpandabear·5 anni fa·1 comments

Ask HN: What date range did Covid arrive on US soil?

1 points·by boldpandabear·5 anni fa·1 comments

comments

boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
They feel the same about you I’m sure.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
[dead]
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
How do they “take over a living thing” if they are non living things that have no energy stores and no metabolic processes?
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
How does a non living thing “do” anything without an internal energy source? How does it “use” a host?
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
The problem with our world now is that there is nowhere left for freedom seekers to go. Rights have been taken and trampled by every government.

Viruses cannot be proven to be contagious nor can they ever be proven to cause illness. vaccine at best is proven to becequivalent of a steroid. It may temporarily prevent symptoms from appearing but it is not proven to have network effects and convey herd immunity.

Humans in fear will do anything. Our world is entrapped by fear.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Whole study is flawed. This is theoretical math philosophy, not a study. A viral particle has never been isolated outside its host, therefore these authors have no idea of the viral concentration in an airborne particle and are just making stuff up.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Same general finding, searches for coronavirus don't start increasing substantially until Mar 9 2020: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2019-11-01%202...
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
ok, then why does the US CDC website attribute the first COVID deaths in the United States as happening the week of January 4th 2020:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Despite all the contradicting evidence and all the holes in the narrative, mankind continues to stick with the germ theory and viral theory paradigms.

When will smart people start to get curious and start to wonder if virus particles were ever the cause of illness to begin with.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
There is no virus that causes the common cold, so this is just more nonsense speculation.

Do yourself and your lineage a favor and research Dr Hamer's Five Biological Laws.

Saying virus particles are the cause of illnesss is like saying ashes are the cause of fire. Both are at the scene of the crime, and neither are at fault.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Particles exist, yes. A few scientists have spun the narrative that transmissible particles CAUSE illness. That is not proven.

Scientists harp on the fact that correlation and association, do not mean causation. Except in virology where circumstantial evidence is enough to upend the freedom of the world for the sake of an abundance of caution. This religion of virology.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Flu counts are down because flu tests are not being administered. Everyone is testing for covid antibodies. If hackers new the five biological laws of nature as discovered by Dr Hamer the world would be a better place.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Any theory that suggests a particle causes illness is still unproven.

Any theory that suggests particles jump from human to human and cause illness is also unproven.

All studies where they’ve attempted to prove it, have failed.

Almost all of viral theory rests on a study where mice trapped in dark chamber got sick when TB particles were piped in. Never been replicated.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
I love how all the “rational” “analytical” “science-trusting” commenters in her choose to ignore data and “science” when it doesn’t fit their beliefs.

The article clearly states “ With our results, we were not able to explain if COVID-19 mortality is reduced by staying at home in ~ 98% of the comparisons after epidemiological weeks 9 to 34.”

And everyone’s conclusion in Hacker News is that the study must be flawed.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
Because viral theory is unproven and likely wrong. Much more likely that illness is the result of stress & conflict.
boldpandabear
·5 anni fa·discuss
It’s never been proven that a particle causes illness.

It’s never been proven that illness is transmissible via particle.

The vaccine may prevent symptoms from appearing (which is nothing new — steroids also do same thing) but social distancing and masking continue to be an unnecessary drain on quality of life.