HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

bowsamic

2,497 karmajoined 4 anni fa
I am rate limited, so I may not reply.

Submissions

Pornhub to stop new UK users accessing site from next week

theguardian.com
8 points·by bowsamic·5 mesi fa·1 comments

comments

bowsamic
·21 ore fa·discuss
I don’t need to give reasons for my son to follow my orders
bowsamic
·ieri·discuss
Why would I tell my son not to drink beer? He can do so as soon as it’s relatively safe to
bowsamic
·19 giorni fa·discuss
[flagged]
bowsamic
·22 giorni fa·discuss
Significantly worse than the Deutschland ticket
bowsamic
·23 giorni fa·discuss
Same on macOS. Could be that we are missing some native compilation option though
bowsamic
·26 giorni fa·discuss
ePub compatibility issues are one of the worst parts of having a Kobo reader. I genuinely miss my Kindle and its simple but reliable MOBI format. At least there everything worked
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
No, I don’t want to name and shame. It was a few years ago
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Inkscape is the only software that I see people get so defensive about when criticised. I even had the lead dev appear in my mentions and try and start fighting me on twitter when I complained on my own timeline about the performance on macOS. Weird culture
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Solipsism is wrong.
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
This is why I don’t use this site. Low IQ discussions and insults from morons
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
You don’t need any observations at all to build up a complete knowledge of the entire universe. Hegel showed this
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
It can resolve them though
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
> Nobody can ever know an ultimate why, for obvious and well established philosophical reasons

Yes we can, you are just presupposing that philosophy is ultimately ineffective. For example Hegel gave a presuppositionless development of all metaphysics among other things. It’s not some kind of philosophical consensus that ultimate justification is impossible
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
I’m just curious if you are so dependent on LLMs that the idea of not using them at all seems extreme to you
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
> But I wonder does this mean no AI was used at all? Even for say, code review?

Would that be surprising to you?
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Any logic with LEM
bowsamic
·2 mesi fa·discuss
This makes it good for formal maths, but bad for philosophy, since it means it can’t encode the speculative movement
bowsamic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
For me the widespread fear over this is evidence that it’s different from syntax highlighting and stuff
bowsamic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
> Just because you use AI doesn't mean your brain grows a black hole from which information can never return.

How do you know this? I’m not taking that risk
bowsamic
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Small stdlib, “implement it yourself” philosophy to even things like classes, diverging language versions and fragmentation (a lot of people don’t like any of the post 5.1 changes), bad tooling and editor support, dynamic duck typed language with no type hints