HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

catoc

640 karmajoined 10 anni fa

comments

catoc
·3 giorni fa·discuss
Haha, nice. TIL.

So all we need is ‘controlled prompting’ to handle prompt injections :-)
catoc
·3 giorni fa·discuss
Exactly!

Attempting to handle prompt injections by prompting the model (not to leak sensitive data), is like attempting to stop a fire by burning the area around it
catoc
·3 giorni fa·discuss
And then the secretary shared the conversation with 260 ‘partners’ and added everything you said to an LLM training corpus…

So, NO, this is not “what secretaries were”
catoc
·12 giorni fa·discuss
Agreed. And even etymology agrees:

Plagiarize comes from plagiarius, latin for ‘kidnapper’.

You cannot kidnap yourself
catoc
·17 giorni fa·discuss
Yeah, the headline changed while I wrote my comment
catoc
·17 giorni fa·discuss
Age Verification is not about “saving kids from spying/social media”.

Same as Regulatory Encryption Backdoors are not about “protecting kids from child predators”

This is framing. Abusing kids is bad. But that is not what this about. Let’s keep the discussion on topic: the goal is 1984-level oversight… not just of the kids

[Edit: I guess HN agrees: meanwhile the title changed from “saving kids from spying” to “is actually mass-surveillance” - good]
catoc
·20 giorni fa·discuss
Which shares your personal data with over 200 “partners”… thanks, but no
catoc
·mese scorso·discuss
https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
So then you need to know distance / roundtrip-length within centimeter precision as well (below 29.98 cm for sub-nanosecond precision… to be precise).

Since cm precision is often not possible, is roundtrip-length an estimated average from prior roundtrips?
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Then, since it’s about publishing (emails), they should have picked

e-mprimatur

(⌐⊙_⊙)
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
That… is true - thanks for editing your comment to clarify

The initial thread read like “.com domains are exclusive to US” which they of course aren’t
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
It is not

Source: own multiple, via EU registrar

(Edit: Parent was edited after reply - parent statement is now correct)
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
https://archive.ph/44z6b
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
“Security through obscurity” has the connotation that it is the obscurity that achieves the security - which is bad.

”Security including obscurity“ is fine.
catoc
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Would you have any more info? I have both: adobe synctool + issues with smb shares
catoc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Fair.

And I my point was I really like the site!

I promise to become lessvocal about the ads.
catoc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Such a great personal project!

These kind of things is what the ‘www’ was created for - good vibes!

Why riddle it with ads?
catoc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
I know, always hard to tell on HN. Added the relevant declarative tag
catoc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
> Are you sure it's a DDoS and not just a DoS?

I think these days it’s ‘DAIS’, as in your site just DAIS - from Distributed/Damned AI Scraping
catoc
·3 mesi fa·discuss
It’s only bad if you’re a closed, for-profit entity

</sarcasm>