ckoerner·2 anni fa·discuss>but know that they were genuinely trying to shape their country into what they thought was best.But _were_ they? (That's rhetorical, they were not.)
ckoerner·3 anni fa·discussWhich is also against the rules and undermines the systems in place to make the encyclopedia more reliable.
ckoerner·3 anni fa·discussWikipedia relies on reliable secondary sources to write an article. If the majority of sources were to claim X came from Y, then yes, but without that, we can't state it as fact.
ckoerner·3 anni fa·discussRepresentation matters. Many people are not represented in the worlds knowledge, much less the creation of it.
But _were_ they? (That's rhetorical, they were not.)