HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

computerphage

no profile record

comments

computerphage
·23 giorni fa·discuss
Why do you agree?
computerphage
·23 giorni fa·discuss
They claim it has a very low false-positive rate, which is meaningfully more nuanced than "accuracy".

"Detect AI-generated content with 99.98% accuracy." -pangram themselves
computerphage
·23 giorni fa·discuss
https://www.pangram.com/research/how-it-works
computerphage
·mese scorso·discuss
In my view, you're the one claiming to be able to tell the difference! You said, "You tend to see that more..."

...which I took to mean that there were threads where you can look at the comments and categorize them into the two categories and then assert that the size of the paid comments category was larger on posts for high margin than it is for low margin.

Like, it makes sense that the incentive is stronger in that case, but that's not what you said. You said "you tend to see that more"
computerphage
·mese scorso·discuss
Palisade Research demonstrated this capability, including fully copying model weights, on May 7th, 2026

https://palisaderesearch.org/blog/self-replication

https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06760
computerphage
·mese scorso·discuss
Do you?? Show me an HN thread where half the comments are paid for
computerphage
·mese scorso·discuss
That strikes me as a really poorly calibrated expectation. Who benefits? Who's paying? How could I get this job?
computerphage
·mese scorso·discuss
This is AI written, according to pangram, and also obviously
computerphage
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Show me a graph of your javelin skill doubling every six months and I'll start asking myself if you'll be the next champion
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
But how do you explain the fact that, before it got bad, it wasn't /already/ bad. You've gotta have some model for why there was a change if the rate wasn't previously at 100% and the claim is that the number "should be 100% unless it was regulated"
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
It didn't used to be regulated. How do you explain the fact that not everyone used to be an opiate addict?
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
> Barely passing body-text contrast in dark themes

This has been killing me recently. Apparently I need slightly higher contrast than some people, and these vibe coded UIs are basically unreadable to my eyes
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Yeah, when I'm writing code I try to avoid zeros and ones, since those are the most common bits, making them essentially noise
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Do you? What's the technical detail here? Why can't you get the model's prediction, even for that first token?
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Related: https://www.transformernews.ai/p/ais-next-big-blue-battlegro...
computerphage
·3 mesi fa·discuss
OpenAI wants to not be responsible for "accidents" that kill more than 100 people, despite some critics arguing that their current actions are likely to cause such harms.
computerphage
·4 mesi fa·discuss
Why are people dangerous? You can just not listen to them.
computerphage
·5 mesi fa·discuss
Why isn't the AI story believable? It seems to me that AI is getting more and more productive
computerphage
·6 mesi fa·discuss
What's your point?
computerphage
·6 mesi fa·discuss
The usual thing is that the market ends up around $0.95 for things like that, if the actors are all solid investors. It only takes one overly enthusiastic yes buyer to break that ceiling, the smart money won't "correct" it down to $0.95

There's another idea, which is make contacts that pay out in shares of an ETF, but I haven't seen this idea put into practice