Why? As the worlds leading contributor to open source and 40 years experience building development tools it is probably the best acquirer. Would you rather Oracle?
Don't confuse gun control with banning guns. If we look at Australia for example, a country often cited in regards to gun control (and I live there), guns are not banned. You can buy a gun, I have family with guns, there are gun shops. But there are restrictions on the type of gun you can buy, 12 gauge shotgun for duck shooting is ok, AR-15 for people shooting is a no go.
But the big difference is the culture, most people in Australia simply don't want to own a gun, it doesn't define who they are. They don't feel threatened or unsafe by not having one.
I am an Azure user and love it, but these articles are comparing apples and oranges. Microsoft, IBM or Oracle include cloud software such as Office 365 or enterprise software such as their ERP systems. Amazon doesn't really even sell comparable software.
One thing people often forget when bagging IE6 is that all browsers were rubbish back then. None followed standards. IE6 was actually a better browser than Netscape and Netscape's next gen browser was too late to be released due to development issues.
According to the people who worked on IE that was never really the intention, it was just assumed from the outside. They intended to create this whole new "amazing" updated browser all baked into Windows that would be maintained and updated. Anyone old enough to remember Windows 98 would remember things like active desktop which was a precursor to this. But legal and technical issues followed and before long they had gone years without a browser update.
> You'll most likely end up implementing an ORM anyway,
This is a really good point. Many people start with the "no ORM" philosophy, realize their application needs some way to map the SQL to the code, time passes..., they have implemented their own half-baked ORM.
Because it is not included. You would purchase a base package for say $20 a month, then start adding the apps you want for another $5 a month each. $$profit$$
I think this was the Holy Grail, a regular PC in a phone form factor. Of course you are left with the problem of needing a monitor and keyboard to plug it into when you want to do any work.
As an old Delphi developer myself I probably agree that if you are writing desktop apps Delphi is hard to beat. But less and less people are writing desktop apps now, and most apps can be written as web apps which users prefer.
This is what happens when you make the health care system capitalist. Despite rumours to the contrary, capitalism doesn't reduce prices, that would make no sense for a company trying to make a profit.