HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

g6taa

no profile record

comments

g6taa
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Slavoj Žižek ?
g6taa
·4 mesi fa·discuss
[dead]
g6taa
·5 mesi fa·discuss
I hadn't seen that button, but at least for me it's not enough: I want to be able to select the camera directly. And in Open Camera I can only select two out of the three cameras.
g6taa
·5 mesi fa·discuss
> 2. I don't have Google Photos and the pixel camera app tries to launch google photos when you want to review the picture you just took. But there is a FOSS app called GPhotosShim that uses the same namespace as google photos and thus fools the camera into launching that app instead. Once launched, it just launches whatever media management app you actually have configured, so it's seamless.

There's also GCam https://github.com/lukaspieper/Gcam-Services-Provider

I don't know if it matters, but GPhotosShim doesn't seem to get updated.
g6taa
·5 mesi fa·discuss
You can select the different cameras and avoid digital zoom.
g6taa
·2 anni fa·discuss
> >Do you support Free Speech of the person screaming obscenities at your young child? False claims about you? Whipping up entire communities to attack you physically? > > Yes. If it's just words and not a direct threat it's fine. > > Direct threats are a fine exception because they promise crossing over from words into physical action, at that point the NAP is violated if you want to look at it that way. No need to wait and see if they're actually going to follow through. > > Aside from that I really don't see any need for further exceptions.

I'd argue that someone who has effectively control over some kind of mob riling them up is quite a bit more threatening than a "direct threat" if they know that mob contains people that will (or even just are very likely to) commit violence as a result of it: instead of making one direct threat, they generate multiple (indirect and possibility silent) ones.