exactly. for example, if i download a movie and edit it, then show it to friends, I'm providing a service in the sense you're arguing, but it's covered by first sale doctrine.
same with fortnite. just because he's using (sharing) the mod doesn't make him any less protected under law
why not a network of pressurized liquefied nuclear material similar to gas heat? distribute the steam turbine system such that each house uses only the radiation it needs
to be honest if i was a horrible person I'd develop a macOS version of the spyware first on the assumption that anyone playing on a mac is probably more wealthy (mac user and goes through the extra effort of playing games on macOS? yeah that's probably someone with a lot of money and technical knowledge) and thus a more valuable target for data harvesting and who knows what other purposes....
sure, I'm pretty sure they check for cheating, but it's not being collected to sell personal data to advertising firms to make an extra buck off the backs of people who already paid for their games
Firefox says "InternalError: too much recursion" and none of the links work on the front page of the site. Not sure what's going on but not a good start.
Policing content isn't the same thing as stopping active damage to the internet. Even in the US where free speech is king, you can't go around slashing tires or taking down stop signs and say it's protected by the 1st amendment or something.