hhhrmmm322

3 anni fadiscuss

Nope. It's mostly about maintaining the class structure, and at least at first this was openly the goal, we've just done a good job starting to pretend that isn't what it is about within the past 60 years or so. Research still happened before all that, it was just funded directly by a patron, which is actually kind of how trying to get a grant works today.

hhhrmmm322

3 anni fadiscuss

I think they meant if you didn't have a relevant bachelor's to go straight into the masters. Given we can't predict which bachelor's (or master's for that matter) is going to be rendered completely obsolete by technology, it's a valid concern. You wont necessarily be able to use your BS in CS to just immediately hop into an MBA program.

hhhrmmm322

3 anni fadiscuss

It's believable for the kinds of organizations that the poster clearly works for.

hhhrmmm322

3 anni fadiscuss

You are obviously having enormous difficulty attracting good ops and infra programmers, but that's mostly going to be due to the obvious lack of respect and probably abysmal pay you are offering.

I would run away from an interview at a company you work for as fast as I possibly could just based on what you've said so far. And if I worked for you I'd quit.

Case in point, you seem completely incapable of understanding how your own lack of expertise and awful pay has driven all the experienced infra people to work for cloud vendors where they can get paid what they deserve and not have to grovel before a bunch of shitty javascript devs or equivalent.

Orgs like yours are trying to hire infra people the way you would hire a web developer. That isn't viable now and has never been viable. Infra roles are (or at least should be for any functional organization) more senior than product roles.

comments