HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jdance

no profile record

comments

jdance
·11 mesi fa·discuss
Just quickly back and forth? For how long in total? Would love to try this
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
Most likely just incompetence
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
Yesterday I asked both claude and gemini to downgrade a package on manjaro and both failed miserably

I use these tools a lot and I would say they fail 50% of the time for my use cases and I baby them every step

”Is it just me” is such a flawed mindset. The reality is staring you in the face
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
This is my experience too, I can burn $20 on a big refactoring in a few hours no problem

A lot of the time (when it works) I think its easily worth the money, but I would quickly break their $100 a month budget
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
The inspector will be AI btw :) (and the year 203x..)
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
Its pretty clear at this point that people want this kind of control implemented, its in the ”zeitgeist”. I have not figured out why, but it does seem that people are more scared then ever.

Its a bit weird on HN where people generally understand this problem regarding privacy, but in other topics like this one they act like the general populace ”put the speeders in jail!”
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
Yeah me neither, I think the CSS being cool and hard to use was the real reason. People like being ”elite”, and tables were just dead simple.

I am surprised people here still hold on to that era of CSS. There are even people in the comments being proud of clearfix

But I should probably be thankful for CSS for getting me out of webdev early :)
jdance
·anno scorso·discuss
This would put anthropic in the business of minimizing the context to increase profits, same as Cursor and others who cheap out on context and try to RAG etc. Which would quickly make it worse, so I hope they stay on api pricing

Some base usage included in the plan might be a good balance
jdance
·2 anni fa·discuss
Yeah the amount of disrespect of developer time they show here is crazy. You could have made the billing api backwards compatible for 10 years, its a super small api, but instead they force breaking changes every couple of years

Maybe it is a strategy for cleaning up old apps or something, but I doubt it
jdance
·2 anni fa·discuss
Seems like a good way to have a bunch of new products to also support