Likewise, perfectionism when it is unneeded can slow teams down to a halt for no reason. The balance in most cases is in the middle, and should shift towards 100% correctness as consequences get more dire.
This is not to say your code should be a buggy mess, but 98% bug free when you're a SaaS product and pushing features is certainly better than 100% bug free and losing ground to competitors.
Why would package be used as the standard? What person fully leveraging AI is going to put up packages for release? They (their AI model) write the code to leverage it themselves. There is no reason to take on the maintenance of a public package just because you have AI now. If anything, packages are a net drag on new AI productivity because then you'd have to worry about breaking changes, etc. As far as actual apps being built by AI, the same indie hackers that had garbage codebases that worked well enough for them to print money are just moving even faster. There are plenty of stories about that.
Yeah, but dogecoin still isn't worth anything and most of the altcoins from christmas past aren't either. You know what is, Mr. Skeptic? Two things: the jealousy you're feeling because they made a calculated risk and it paid off, and the fiat value of BTC as an asset. So run back to your stocks, keep making the same trades everybody else does in the name of "sense" and tell me how you feel when all that "sense" your talking about collapses in two years when the economy cycles.
This is not to say your code should be a buggy mess, but 98% bug free when you're a SaaS product and pushing features is certainly better than 100% bug free and losing ground to competitors.