Because it is not so focused on people as much as it is with "people in cities." Cities are the future of low carbon emissions. So specifically simulating and visualizing the happiness of people within cities is huge. There is great potential for this work.
This is breakthrough. I'm telling you, it is a game changer, and it was coded by women -- which is also significant.
Simulation of human life combined with reality capture and BIM software are going to change the game. So-much-so that the market price of commodities like copper and aluminum are going to become of GLOBAL interest.
This could not have come at a better time than when scientists are freaking out about the Great Barrier Reef being almost completely dead.
I think it got cancelled because it is a real startup now.
Let me explain! Put yourself in CEO's shoes: you have employees who love working for you but you need to get them a paycheck. From that perspective, it is easy to see that it is kind of crazy to enter into these lengthy government discussions that could possibly ruin your business and delay the entire industry! No thanks!!
If they're all really engineers who just love doin' the work, they will be a valuable contracting outfit doin' the exact same work for a steadier paycheck.
> Another idea: some progress has been made on optical character recognition, so if he can write well enough, it may be possible that you may be able to scan his written programs, and convert them to source file easily, without having to transcribe them. So the process could be smooth enough.
I was going to ask if he has access to a smartphone to take and send photos of paper?
Set up a server for it. Hell turn it into a business.
This is a much easier problem to solve. There are certainly different ways in which objects can collide though, so that would make the problem more interesting and complex.