The problem I kept hitting with agent workflows (especially cloud hosted agents) was that the artifacts they produced became really awkward to handle across different cloud sessions.
So I built Artifacta as the boring storage layer underneath. Agents store and retrieve artifacts via CLI, REST API, Python SDK, or an MCP server. Artifacts are grouped by session/agent metadata, deduped on identical content, and safe to retry (idempotency keys), making it easy to handle artifacts across different sessions.
Would love any feedback for those who run mutli-agent orchestration or if you deal with artifacts across different agents.
KOSPI isn't really a country index, it's more like a concentrated chip/HBM ETF in disguise. Samsung Electronics + SK Hynix alone are roughly 30-40% of the index by market cap, and both move on the same AI-capex thesis as Nvidia/TSMC. So it seems to be the same trade pulling back expressed through a country index that's levered to it.
About half of America’s off-grid energy projects are in Texas. The OpenAI/Oracle data center in Shackelford County is running on its own gas plant. That’s the real Texas advantage.
It’s not just taxes or cheap power. It’s that you can put the power plant and the inference cluster in the same operating loop to avoid waiting years in an interconnection queue.
Buried near the end: Nisshin Seifun Welna stopped printing cooking time on their spaghetti packaging tape. There's a Japanese consumer somewhere squinting at the package trying to remember if it was 8 mins or 10 mins.
This is what "globalized supply chain" looks like up close.
The deny-with-reason is undersold here. Most hook frameworks treat denials as the end of the road: the LLM hits a wall, retries blindly, and gets blocked again.
Feeding the reason back into Claude's context could break that cycle much faster.
One question for the author: when several hooks fire, does Claude get all the denial reasons concatenated, or does the first deny win?
"Handedness" is two traits, not one. The paper finds bipedalism explains strength (how strongly someone prefers a hand); brain size explains direction (which one). Most coverage conflates them.
Australopithecus was already strongly lateralized — committed handers — long before the rightward consensus emerged. Two traits, evolved separately by millions of years.
Engineers solving "my agent stops when I close my lid" by physically holding the lid open is the funniest possible local optimum. Amphetamine app fixes the lid problem. Claude's /remote-control command also helps. The two together cost zero dollars and one minute of setup.
The macOS sleep-prevention naming canon: caffeinate (built-in), Amphetamine (App Store), and now modafinil. At this rate the next one's going to require a prescription.
"Tests are how you turn an unreliable agent into a reliable system" <— 100%.
Once you're running 5+ agents in parallel, review-as-trust stops being physically possible. There isn't time, and there are too many concurrent diffs. The trust mechanism has to move into the gates: precise specs, deterministic test suites, exit codes as ground truth.
It's roughly the same shift teams went through when they moved from "senior dev reads every PR" to "CI is the source of truth." Mechanical, unromantic, and the only thing that truly scales.
On the skill atrophy point, I think the analysis is directionally right. The senior engineering skill that agents reward most won’t be review. It's having the system design fundamentals and writing the quality gates to assure functional needs are met and non-functional fundamentals are in tact.