HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jonathankoren

no profile record

comments

jonathankoren
·2 anni fa·discuss
>It also won't surprise me if this private key ends up being stolen by someone else, and used against its original owner.

And that is exactly why backdoored encryption is bad.
jonathankoren
·2 anni fa·discuss
You don’t even have to be this conspiratorially minded to believe the NSA is a legitimate suspect here. (For the record, I think literally every intelligence agency on Earth is plausible here.)

You kind of lost the thread when you say, “act against the interests of American citizens and companies”. Bro, literally anyone could be using xz, and anyone could be using Red Hat. You’re only “acting against Americans” if you use it against Americans. I don’t know who was behind this, but a perfectly plausible scenario would be the NSA putting the backdoor in with an ostensibly Chinese login and then activating on machines hosted and controlled by people outside of the US.

Focusing on a specific distro is myopic. Red Hat is popular.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
Yeah. There’s a lot of wishful thinking about science and sciencing up solutions to the world’s problems — especially here. The fact is, most progress is slow, and even if there is progress, it’s not necessarily economical in either financial or energy perspective.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
The Martian canals are interesting misinformation phenomena. A phenomenon that we’ve seen repeated among the woo crowd.

Schiaprelli points his telescope at Mars, and sees some faint squiggles. He suspects they’re something dried river beds, and calls them “channels”, like a river channel. Being Italian, he uses the Italian word, “canali”.

This word, being the same word used for “canal” in English, gets translated as “canal”. However in English, “canal” refers exclusively to an artificial construction, where as “channel” doesn’t have that distinction.

This framing now primes, people when looking at blurry faint marks on Mars. Someone tries to map the “canals” and either through an act of simplification/illustration, or psychological priming, connects dark regions (river deltas?) to each other via straight lines — perhaps the shape most evocative of artificiality.

And so it snowballs.

I don’t think the canal theory ever gained much traction. (It’s a wild idea!) Telescopes just weren’t good enough to consistently observe the channels, let alone see them well enough for a definitive answer. We had to wait for Mariner 4 for that.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
It’s not just that. There’s a very real outrage machine on the right that works the refs so they get a breaks for what are very obvious TOS violations.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
It’s a very real thing.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
YouTube always gives me the vague “people in your area and time of day” answer, which is totally bullshit. It’s content driven. You watch a video about fighter jets, or Ukraine, get Matt Walsh telling you how we have to eliminate trans kids. Watch an Alan Watts or Terrance McKenna video, get an ad about how the ancient Egyptians used magic flutes to generate antigravity fields to build the pyramids.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
Yeah. “Neo-liberal” is defiantly not how I’d describe YouTube political content. Everything I get is far right bullshit.
jonathankoren
·3 anni fa·discuss
The problem of course, is that these assertions about genetic determinism are repeatedly shown to be absolute bullshit.

To bring it back to the initial “Women don’t want to code, because they’re genetically repulsed by it” argument, whe know this isn’t true, because it changed in living memory.

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/07/1141358586/women-coders-progr...
jonathankoren
·4 anni fa·discuss
Syncing? Just load it onto some cloud storage provider you already have. That’s what 1Password used for years before they decided to go the subscription route. It worked great.
jonathankoren
·8 anni fa·discuss
It worked just fine for me.
jonathankoren
·8 anni fa·discuss
I certainly took the article to be implying that this was new behavior, but now seems to have been something they secretly started back in 2014 or so.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/6/17203114/facebook-mark-zuc...
jonathankoren
·8 anni fa·discuss
1) Users are explicitly not allowed to do this. You can delete things in your inbox, you can’t delete things in other people’s inboxes.

2) It convienely starts happenening right when FB finds themselves in a shitshow, and with a CEO that famously said, “They trust me — dumb fucks”. There is no evidence that this is anything except something very very new.

3) Document retention policies only work for your company. Not someone else’s. I have no right to go into your documents and shred things I no longer want you to have.
jonathankoren
·10 anni fa·discuss
Clickle raised a bunch of money from high profile people, and it was nothing but vapor.
jonathankoren
·10 anni fa·discuss
Yup. My grandmother bought me it for christmas, no doubt full retail. It was inordinately expensive. It would be inordinately expensive today with a retail cost of $100 inflation adjusted dollars.

Best 2600 title screen ever though. No one ever mentions that about the game though.