Pretty much everyone in the lower level classes is cheating. Some of it's just "driving five-over" and some is practically murder. I've heard Chinese students talking throughout entire exams in big lecture halls, students leaving lab and immediately finding their friends waiting outside for the next lab section and dishing all the details of the day's lab, and students giving away a little too much information when talking about their strategy for a project.
Uber won't even be necessary. If it becomes cheaper to "rent" the service of the car (i.e. Uber/Lyft with autonomous vehicles), then car manufacturers can just cut out the middle-man. Uber/Lyft would serve no purpose anymore unless they somehow make it cheaper (which would be practically impossible).
The landscape of the future is car manufacturers offering their own "Uber" like service and that service replacing the traditional ownership model. That doesn't mean Uber doesn't have a place before then though. Like good little capitalists, the VC's will cash out and make a ton of money while the real innovation and lasting impact happens elsewhere. So, yeah, Uber should blow up when self-driving cars become a thing but they'll eventually fade away. Unfortunately, that won't be for a long time.
EDIT: Oh, and yeah, people are also going to still be buying a shitload still anyway.
This is the sort-of obvious eventuality of a world filled with dozens of different services. Of course a new service will come that tries to bridge them all together in a simple way that is efficient for the user. Imagine if all the USA's cable channels were different apps that took up space on your TV's hard drive (like phone applications). Now imagine your TV has a way of visiting "lesser" channels (web browser). Now imagine that, eventually, the channels you care about begin integrating into the web browser (the numerous applications that now offer browser-based components). Now imagine someone comes along and says you can use a single service to access all those channels (shouldn't be hard to imagine that because it's how things are now..).
The innovation here, imo, is that WeChat is essentially a web browser that looks and feels very different from traditional web browsers. It's a big deal given the conditions of today; i.e. cloud-based and browser-based applications are becoming the norm. Interesting, for sure. I see a future in it, anyway.
That's my hangup. This promises a lot but only delivers on not having algorithms for your content and not having ads. That's great but adblock takes care of the ads and the algorithms are often not so big a deal (e.g. when subscribing to a small subreddit). I see literally not reason why it would encourage the language buzzwords.
I'm curious what you think is so marvelous about it. What sets this apart from, say, Reddit or HN? The idea seems to be displaying "conversations" as a tree. You don't need a new platform to do that.
Fosh. Dude is a scumbag. You know that meeting he just put together for/with Trump, with all the tech. leaders, centered around tech. employment? You know, the one with people like Jeff Bezos, Larry Page, Sheryl Sandberg, Tim Cook, Elon Musk, Ginni Rometty, Brian Krzanich...and Alex Karp.
Hmm, let's see.
Amazon employs 250k+ people;
Alphabet employs 60k+;
Facebook employs 15k+;
Musk's companies employ 30k+;
IBM employs 350k+;
Intel employs 100k+;
...
Palantir employs around 2000, but Alex Karp got to go to that meeting. I wonder who Palantir's biggest shareholder is...hmm?
P.S. The meeting also had Satya Nadella (Microsoft), Chuck Robbins (Cisco), and Safra Catz (Oracle)..and all three of Trump's children - who took seats from companies like HP, Dell, all telecomms, Xerox, and more. Seriously: fuck Peter Thiel.
I don't know, man. My grades always seemed to reflect my understanding pretty damn well. If it wasn't reflecting my understanding, I knew it wasn't.
To be fair to the writer, it'd be a much longer and more difficult article if it was called "Tips for understanding concepts in math." I don't even know how you could approach that.
Also, what the heck is wrong with memorizing definitions? You can't prove something using nothing. Eventually, after doing enough proofs employing the definition (or axiom or theorem or whatever else you memorized), you won't have to even think about it anymore - similar to how you or I could find the first derivative of a polynomial without thinking about it or know the definition of an even number.