HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

joshyeager

no profile record

Submissions

Why AI Spending Reminds Jim Chanos of the Fracking Bubble

paulkrugman.substack.com
1 points·by joshyeager·anno scorso·0 comments

The Illusion of Moral Decline

experimental-history.com
8 points·by joshyeager·3 anni fa·0 comments

Covid State of Affairs: Jan 24

yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com
4 points·by joshyeager·4 anni fa·0 comments

comments

joshyeager
·9 mesi fa·discuss
The Coleman bacon doesn't list ingredients. But the Applegate bacon lists celery powder because that is a source of nitrates. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celery_powder
joshyeager
·anno scorso·discuss
Thank you for ABZÛ! My daughter has played it at least ten times. And when she wrote a letter to your team for a school project, you sent back a t-shirt and a soundtrack CD. We've listened to that CD for hours on road trips, it is a great soundtrack.
joshyeager
·2 anni fa·discuss
In my case, they took so long to announce the iPhone 12 Mini that I gave up waiting and bought an SE even though it was slower than I wanted and had a poor camera. Four months later they announced the Mini, but I wasn't willing to replace a four-month-old phone. Then they discontinued the Mini line after 13.

When I was ready to buy a new phone, there were no iPhone Mini models for sale. It took more than a year, but I finally found an iPhone 13 Mini in stock on the Apple Refurbished store. Now I'm hoping to keep this phone alive until they finally release another small iPhone.
joshyeager
·3 anni fa·discuss
That link is about E-85. E-85 is 85% ethanol (actually 60%-85% depending on the season and the gas station). Ethanol has 30% less energy density than pure gasoline, so E-85 has 0.3*0.85=0.255 less energy density than pure gasoline. That is why E-85 gets 25% lower gas mileage.

"Standard" E-10 gasoline contains between 0% and 10% ethanol. E-15 is 15% ethanol. So E-15 has at most 4.5% less energy density than standard gasoline. You would not see a 25% decrease in gas mileage between standard gas and E-15.
joshyeager
·4 anni fa·discuss
Thanks, that is helpful! You’re right that terminology is confusing.
joshyeager
·4 anni fa·discuss
I understand that passwordless auth is better UX. But it seems like a step backwards in security from two factor authentication. Why are all these major players pushing passwordless auth but not allowing a password in conjunction with a FIDO2 token? I feel like I’m missing some important detail.
joshyeager
·4 anni fa·discuss
Rather than saying "You are close to understanding, but keep going", it would be more helpful to explain why you think that disciplined empathy is no longer empathy.

I agree with the previous poster, but I'm curious to learn what you mean.
joshyeager
·4 anni fa·discuss
As someone who learned photography with film in an old Nikon but hasn't kept up, how is it possible to get two extra stops from a RAW file? And why does it need to be done in post processing instead of the camera just recording the image with the sensor's full dynamic range in the first place?
joshyeager
·4 anni fa·discuss
That is very interesting! What was causing the 100w phantom load, and how did you find it?
joshyeager
·5 anni fa·discuss
Yes, but I can only find the link on the main page of the blog, not in individual posts. Here it is:

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/feed
joshyeager
·5 anni fa·discuss
In a privately-held company, you usually can't sell your stock without approval (from the board, a shareholder vote, or some other mechanism). That generally makes it quite difficult to sell.

Dividends are the main source of value from stock in a company that doesn't plan to sell. But dividends are also determined by the board. In a closely-held company, the majority owners may also be the board, and they may prefer to leave the profits in the company or take them out a different way.

"Worthless" is an extreme characterization, but the value you receive from owning a minority amount of private stock is much less predictable and controllable than publicly-traded stock.
joshyeager
·12 anni fa·discuss
But the original question was about whether these jobs exist. Given that there are significant coordination and communication costs as the number of people on a team increases, it's in the employer's best interest to get more (productive) hours from a smaller number of people. If someone working a 16-hr work week incurs more communication overhead than useful product, employers won't hire someone who only wants that arrangement.