\> statistical learning theory does not adequately model the macro-behavior of very large models.
Might you please elaborate on this? I recognize that "artificial neural networks are lossy de/compression algorithms" does not enumerate the nuances of these structures, but am curious whether anything in particular is both interesting and missing from SLT.
To indulge in a bit of tinfoil-hatting re "some people just wanted to silence it": Tlon, Corp., the Red Hat to Urbit's Fedora, rejected Y-Combinator funding last year.
Urbit was initally released into the Public Domain, and still retains that spirit even though circumstance compels the project to now bear the MIT License - I suspect non-attributed copying would not be challenged.
The advocatus diaboli is obliged no apology (nor the promotor fidei for that matter), being (ideally) merely hypothetical, to be spun-up and shut down as dialectic requires. However, do note that there is a difference between political divisions existing, and political divisions having effects beyond the groups of their self-identified constituents. The former, like the poor, will always be with us [0], differing only in visibilty. But, if visibility is a no-op, meaningless to the res publica's execution of policy, then is not the venom neutralized? We currently live in a world of political polarization, but worse, one's affinity towards those poles has material impact on one's life. Surrender Voice, NVFE claims, let like associate with like via Exit, and never be troubled by politics again.
[0] Until humans are so radically different that neither remains.
The "No Voice, Free Exit" response: Hopefully right next to each other, dutifully segregated with freedom of movement maintained between each.
Edit: Now, certain of the neo-reactos are hyper-cautious about the effects of entryism, which the above scenario would seem powerless to prevent, but so long as public displays of political identification have no effect on the actual behavior of the governors in the NVFE world the only thing for agent provocateurs to enter would be social circles, whose burden of maintaining memetic purity under fire would not be substantially different from the present, with even less down-stream stakes (as the strengthening or dissolution of such societies would not change sovereign policy).
Which scientific tradition ought one consult where this subject has been foregrounded?