Private entities have a right to free speech. Nobody has ever pretended that social media platforms or any other type of bulletin board system is a public utility. The government or any other entity leveraging the legal system to force them to carry content would be a violation of their free speech.
If you do not like the way they run their platforms Voat and 8chan are perfectly fine options. But larger audiences stay away from those platforms because they are unmoderated cesspools. Could it be that what the “anti censorship“ crowd really wants is a free audience?
If you do not like the way they run their platforms Voat and 8chan are perfectly fine options. But larger audiences stay away from those platforms because they are unmoderated cesspools. Could it be that what the “anti censorship“ crowd really wants is a free audience?