HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

lefty2

no profile record

comments

lefty2
·12 giorni fa·discuss
I tried both unordered_flat_map and hopscotch map with the pathfinding algorithm that my game uses. Both were slower than regular unordered_map. unordered_flat_map about 33% slower and hopscotch was 390% slower
lefty2
·mese scorso·discuss
They would be jamming their own glide bombs and drones then. It would be more useful to jam Russian airspace to defeat Ukrainian drone attacks.
lefty2
·2 mesi fa·discuss
> If / when enough companies exit the market

That will only happen when the bubble bursts and those companies will exit by going bankrupt
lefty2
·2 mesi fa·discuss
Who is it written by anyway? The author's name is not given in the article
lefty2
·3 mesi fa·discuss
I wonder how many false positives there were. Typically this types of static analysis tools come up with a ton of potential bugs, but only a few of them are actual bugs.
lefty2
·3 mesi fa·discuss
https://www.forbes.com/sites/phoebeliu/2025/11/10/openai-spe...
lefty2
·3 mesi fa·discuss
Sora was losing 15M a day and it was running at least 3 months, so that's a total 1.3 Billion. That's a pretty expensive experiment. It sounds like a company with lots of VC to burn and no discipline. Even Jensen Huang accused them of lack of discipline in business approach.
lefty2
·3 mesi fa·discuss
also they need to pay back that in one year, so if OpenAI don't IPO this year they are screwed
lefty2
·4 mesi fa·discuss
> -1 still produces -1 instead of 0 That could be a problem depending how you are using it.
lefty2
·4 mesi fa·discuss
> The same trick can also be used for the other direction to save a division:

> NewValue = OldValue >> 3;

You need to be careful, because this doesn't work if the value is negative. A
lefty2
·6 mesi fa·discuss
> Yes, OpenAI is burning $8-12B in 2025

OpenAI actually burnt $12B in just one quarter (not for the entire year as he claims)

https://www.thurrott.com/a-i/openai-a-i/329108/openai-lost-1...
lefty2
·6 mesi fa·discuss
c++ 03 was a lot easier.

For instance, if you want to avoid unnecessary copy operations when returning a string, just return it in variable that you pass by reference (eg. void doSomething(string& str);) likewise avoid the vector class making unnecessary copies, simply by creating the objects on the heap and use a vector of pointers instead of values. It's a bit more ugly, but it works, and you don't need to read a 24 page blog to understand all the corner cases where it can go wrong. modern c++ is all about syntactic suger.
lefty2
·8 mesi fa·discuss
If it's untrustworthy, why do they prevent us from disabling "AI overview"?