That's an impressively detailed response. Did you happen to track all these kinds of quotes routinely for your own research, or are you that good at finding this info that quickly.
Why do you need to pretend things are racist when they aren't? IT and security use medical terms like 'viruses', and bad computers are 'wiped clean', so 'clean' is a common term and there's no reason to pretend that its intended to be racist. A clean network is a joke though and will fail
When the new registrations begin (Jan 2022), hopefully the former owners moved off of them completely, before an attacker registers them, points the MX records, leading to mailbox collection and password resets. Without ownership, it might be hard to change other systems (DNS-based verification).
Ya, but if only six of the 16 are hashed, I'm trying to think of where an attacker will deduce the other 10? It's a known integer space, but how do they know which 10 belong to the other 6?
I have often wondered when a UI will be 'settled' and won't need to be updated anymore. But then what will the UI designers do? Idle fingers make new designs?
> The breach was restricted to an isolated system containing non-sensitive masked card primarily used for display purposes on merchant UI and cannot be used for completing a transaction. All of the customers’ full card numbers, order information, card PINs, or passwords are secure. The compromised data does not contain any transaction or order information.
> In this case, Juspay has hashed the 16-digit debit and credit card numbers in order to process transactions.
> Juspay has masked only six digits out of sixteen-digit card numbers. Rajaharia says that while this is good, the safety of users rests primarily on the hashing algorithm.
So your theory is, because they didn't release the Cozy Bear signatures, that it must be CIA/NSA? That's a huge stretch to the opposite side of the conspiracy. How do you explain the hacking of the Treasury and other government agencies in your scenario?