The User sets up a "new" (non Google) phone, and isn't given an option to decline consent to Googles ToS.
Now how does this work with a physical product? It needs to be compliant on the 25th of May 2018, but the version of Android may be old and not updated (given its Android). Even if there was an update waiting to resolve GDPR related issues, you would need to agree to the ToS to get that update, to enable opt-out?
In that point of view, it seems a rather unfair complaint. I havn't checked the other's yet, but I start to feel that perhaps these have been filed too early, without enough thought and examination, just to get headlines?
I think this article misses a key point about fairness that seems to be ignored (I have not read the underlying paper, so perhaps its bad journalism)
In this scenario:
"In the first scenario, participants had to decide if they wanted to transfer two coins from person A (who already had four coins) to person B (who had one). Researchers note the “transfer would reduce inequality,” (as there’s less of a gap between them), but person B would end up one coin richer than person A, reversing their status."
"Just 45% accepted the redistribution when it changed the hierarchy."
They have focused on changing the hierarchy, and this is where fairness comes in.
Should people who have "wealth" be forced to a redistribution mechanism, where that person ends up poorer than everyone else? - Its one thing to redistribute for to reduce or eliminate inequality, its another to make them poorer than everyone else (even if the overall equality is reduced)
So I don't think its about maintaining the hierarchy, but a sense of fairness in the redistribution
If you looking for the Raspberry Pi 2 downloads or the x86 download for Embedded Device you need to sign into your plex pass account first, then theres a button on the downloads page called "Plex Pass Downloads"
It seems as its a beta its only open to plex pass subscribers.
It's Taken me 30minutes to work this out (luckily I am a subscriber)
The other two are for web apps, and legacy win32 apps.
They all take different apporaches. So this one for iOS is a recompile and modify approach, Android is more of an Android SubSystem within the OS approach (like the old Unix subsystem that they had)
I'm generally a fan of this idea, as long as its implemented correctly.
At the moment lots of western countries, spend billions on welfare entitlement, and billions more administering a complex system, so that politicans can change particular benefits to win votes from certian groups of voters.
Under this system, all benefits are replaced with a single, universal level, so politicans can give rises either to everyone, or no one. (The only additional benefits should be for those with serve disabilities).
You also lose the withdrawal issues of going from out of work, to in work, you can get rid of things like minimum wages, as their not needed any more, and you can support a more flexible labour market.
Politicans cannot fight over, how particular benefits can change, say increase pensions, but cut unemployment.
If you also merge this into the tax system, with a flat tax as a negative income tax, it is even more efficient.
And eventually you also get what alot of people on the right want - a smaller, more efficient goverment, while doing what alot of people on the left want.
