Not the state, but major cities each have several good cloth-diaper-as-a-service (CDAAS?) companies. You pay a subscription fee and exchange dirty diapers for fresh ones every week. Makes the whole process convenient as using disposables.
Excellent choice. Two of the best reasons to recommend:
1. Hiccup syntax is a great way to “template” HTML, being clojure-native data structures with the full power of the language available to you.
2. REPL-driven workflow makes it a dream to debug things like request handlers.
You will miss out on some perks from bigger/more popular frameworks—there’s no built-in admin panel waiting for you—but you can take advantage of the Lisp Curse here and quickly build out what’s missing. I find it’s a worthwhile trade-off.
> For example, if I can choose between 50 carousels implemented in React vs. 2 in Elm, and I'm an average developer -- what will I choose?
IMO this is an advantage of the smaller/smarter/niche (whatever you want to call them) programming communities. When they congregate around a couple libraries for common problems, those libraries tend to be very good. Speaking from experience in the Elm and Clojure ecosystems.
It’s much better in terms of developer time to evaluate 2 good libraries than 50 libraries where the quality ranges from abysmal to good.