> We won't use Piwik. Mozilla uses Google Analytics for website analytics. Hosting our own is more work for a worse product.
Hi Mozilla, Piwik team here. Would you mind explaining what you found worse in Piwik VS Google and reporting your feedback to us, so we have a chance to improve and in the future to see Mozilla use Piwik to track users, rather than Google?
Piwik (open source project & community) and Piwik PRO (one polish company) used to be related somehow to each other (part of the Piwik core team was working at Piwik PRO) but this changed drastically in 2016 after some internal disagreements. As of 2016 there is no Piwik PRO employee working on Piwik or having commit access, no website access, etc. Piwik the open source project & team members became fully independant from Piwik PRO. The company is still buying ads on the homepage and other pages, which can be confusing, but it helps the Piwik project to sustain operations. More details in http://piwik.org/faq/new-to-piwik/faq_21984/
Piwik does scale to millions of pages per month. We've managed installs of Piwik at _1 billion_ pages per month that's 30 million per day! Don't believe what you read on Hacker News ;-)
Piwik is scalable up to at least 1 billion actions per month. Piwik is scalable! But it is not cheap, as one needs powerful database servers with a lot of RAM and fast SSD disks. It can be costly, but Piwik scales!
Hi Mozilla, Piwik team here. Would you mind explaining what you found worse in Piwik VS Google and reporting your feedback to us, so we have a chance to improve and in the future to see Mozilla use Piwik to track users, rather than Google?