HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

maybe_pablo

no profile record

comments

maybe_pablo
·19 giorni fa·discuss
In HuggingChat (https://huggingface.co/chat) you can test open models for free and even test specific providers.

From there I collected the following US providers currently serving GLM 5.2:

- Together (https://www.together.ai/models)

- Fireworks (https://fireworks.ai/models)

- Featherless (https://featherless.ai/models)
maybe_pablo
·19 giorni fa·discuss
Weight quantization, n-expert capping, routing to smaller model, context window truncation, aggressive sampling constraints, lossy speculative decoding and probably more.
maybe_pablo
·27 giorni fa·discuss
icloud+ hide my email for $0.99
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
[dead]
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
Sure they are, if the human expert follows instructions from a manager or a client, if they are of utility to anybody, then they are vulnerable to social engineering and malicious input. An attack may be easy or hard depending on the expert's training, but nobody is flawless.
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
By "heard of social engineering?" I meant that humans are vulnerable to malicious input too. Prompt injection is basically a simplified form of social engineering for language models. It looks different because models operate over much smaller and more explicit contexts than humans do and are explicitly trained to follow instructions, but the general idea is similar: malicious input tries to manipulate how the system interprets trust and instructions. This is why we need protocols, permissions, and opsec for both agents and humans. That said, I’m not criticizing how you choose to use, or not use, these models, though.
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
Sure, and I don’t disagree, but goods and services still need to scale to billions of people. Most people aren’t going to start knitting their own clothes, or have the time to, just like most companies probably won’t rely on fully hand-written software if cheaper automated alternatives are good enough. What you want or enjoy is one thing; the reality of society is another.
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
That’s fair. I do think, however, that the software industry may become a bit like the clothing industry: there will still be an artisanal market for people who want human-made software, but to be honest I wouldn’t expect it to remain the mainstream option.
maybe_pablo
·mese scorso·discuss
Ever heard of social engineering? Also, models nowadays are way sharper than they were even a year ago. They’re not going to make stupid mistakes like that unless you basically ask them to. GPT-5.x for example would bend over backwards to avoid even reading your passwords into context.
maybe_pablo
·3 mesi fa·discuss
I did kind of the opposite, I made my main beefy gaming computer the router, then connected to it a nice wireless AP in bridge mode to serve internet to the rest of the computers. That way I can have a local llm agent manage my network and firewall by simply asking.
maybe_pablo
·11 mesi fa·discuss
Very interesting! I made just yesterday a track with Yamanote's Shinagawa melody https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haV1O8hqaaE (using Suno)