HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

micromacrofoot

4,491 karmajoined 5 anni fa
your time is better spent doing literally anything else

comments

micromacrofoot
·4 ore fa·discuss
I mean it might be a thing in 100 years but we're not even close now
micromacrofoot
·3 giorni fa·discuss
personal medical information is an entirely separate regulatory environment
micromacrofoot
·3 giorni fa·discuss
the provider using AI to takes notes is still responsible for what happens to those notes
micromacrofoot
·5 giorni fa·discuss
getting serious theranos vibes from this
micromacrofoot
·7 giorni fa·discuss
Amazon generally doesn't do single item delivery for perishable groceries though, Fresh has a $100 minimum to avoid fees, for example.

Non-perishables are fine on a single-unit purchase because again, they're not just going to your house, they're going to dozens in your area every single day.

I know where you're coming from, but there's a reason this whole model exists, and it's not because it costs more.
micromacrofoot
·7 giorni fa·discuss
I'm surprised you don't know any inefficient people! I know many. A friend drives 15 minutes out of the way because that grocery store is a little less crowded (they're the same chain). They've probably been doing it for a decade.

> that F150 going 5 extra miles is more efficient than a Prius driving 25 miles from a Costco to their home.

but that's not what's happening, Amazon isn't driving a Prius to your individual home then back to the warehouse... it's driving to a hundred people on an algorithmically optimized route. They do this because efficiency at scale makes them more profit.

Individual people make inefficient preferential decisions all the time, because the incentive to measure and improve these things is too low to bother on an individual scale.
micromacrofoot
·7 giorni fa·discuss
this isn't even close to true and falls apart in a number of ways, the most popular vehicle in america right now (F-series truck) is woefully inefficient for just about everything

there are people who regularly go out of their way to drive to their favorite store for like 1-2 special items, people bring their dogs along on trips for companionship and leave them sitting in an air conditioned idling car while they shop

individuals are irrationally inefficient in dozens of ways that large businesses root out, for better or worse
micromacrofoot
·7 giorni fa·discuss
> I suspect delivery of single items cuts back significantly on trips to the store.

Amazon is also specifically incentivized to be efficient at scale, it impacts their bottom line to the point where they care about the shape of their vehicles. Individuals don't operate on the same scale so these sort of micro-optimizations don't happen.
micromacrofoot
·7 giorni fa·discuss
Occasionally posts like this do get the attention of the company responsible, more than an email does... but indeed that's like a one in a million situation
micromacrofoot
·8 giorni fa·discuss
it's a more complex version of what happens in the third world too, it's not about class it's about people
micromacrofoot
·9 giorni fa·discuss
yes, this is how the system is designed

employees are not given the power to legally take bribes, but the people running the company can (and it's not called a bribe, it's called business)
micromacrofoot
·9 giorni fa·discuss
thats for employees so they don't profit from government deals
micromacrofoot
·9 giorni fa·discuss
to be fair, it's all trash
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
> unpleasant

> happily

I think you answered your own question really, a lot of animals just enjoy eating them (humans included!)
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
the only difference is whether or not its realized, no? they're using wealth to avoid that
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
So they repackaged Fable and added "don't scare the government" to the prompt
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
The linked view of the chart is distributed by income percentile, the title is "Wealth by income percentile"
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
even with this scam the top 1% of earners still have more annual income than ~75% of the population
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
the top 1% have nearly as much income as the bottom 80%

https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distr...
micromacrofoot
·10 giorni fa·discuss
I'm not saying it's better, just pointing out that it's a problem capitalizing on another problem and there's no real virtue here... only advertising, let's stop getting tricked by advertising