Hey there, thanks for the feedback--looks like we don't handle the case where the search input is empty :). Will submit a helpful error message for future users shortly.
This. If you start with a 'usual bro-split' where you work out each 'muscle-group' once a week, you won't see anything like the progress you'll see on SS or SL5x5 if you're a complete beginner.
Even at an advanced beginner/intermediate stage it's still better to work each 'muscle-group' twice a week.
I also use Jekyll/GH-pages, and it really 'just works'. Usually the only thing I spent time on was cosmetics, but even out of the box it doesn't look bad, plus there are (as mentioned before) lots of free templates.
I know a lot of people use Medium as well, but I'm not sure how it handles syntax highlighting.
Nice. I'm a (former) 1950-2k HoN player and I totally agree that communication/hero-picks/playing to the strength of team composition is how to win 95% of the time, with the 5% losing coming when (because of fatigue or w/e) mechanical skills and communication breakdown.
I've been working on a similar tool for my own personal use, and have found it's MUCH easier for "pop music" which tends to always be diatonic w/ only a few borrowed chords at most, not to mention basslines almost always reaffirm the chord progression.
I've found it harder to figure out how to distinguish the upper harmonies over a pedal in terms of algorithmic writing, since I still associate certain chords with "feelings".
Interesting, it's kind of what clothing retailers have been doing especially in the past ten years or so. I think the access to more shopping options have led consumers to expect "large discounts" so maybe companies benefit from high original MSRP more than "pricing right".
As someone who recently switched from academic music composition to a corporate job, this is really cool.
I've used Finale in its various versions for over 6 years now, and it's still widely considered in academia as the best notation software, not because of its ease-of-use but because of the depth to which one can add weird/special notation to the score.
In my experience, either composers are using Finale, or a combination of Sibelius and Adobe InDesign. This being said, most of the (albeit mostly American, or Americans in Europe) composers I have met/worked with often use notation software as the last step in the composition process.
The collaborative aspect of Flat.io is really nice, but until the depth of notation catches up to the desktop clients like Finale/Sibelius, I have a hard time seeing (at least) concert/academic composers make the switch.
Side note: is it possible to rebind the note values to different keys? I've gotten so used to Finale's 4=eighth, 5=quarter, command+(NUM) for duplets/triplets, etc.
That'd be cool, I wonder how it'd handle multiple oscillators though. Also given how huge raw audio files are, wouldn't a totally web-based DAW be seriously bottle-necked by connection speed?