HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mpdehaan2

no profile record

comments

mpdehaan2
·11 anni fa·discuss
They can be applied by the owner, but I guess I was thinking more of the ability to have a required 'component' field or a required field for the type of the ticket.
mpdehaan2
·11 anni fa·discuss
I'm not positive they use it for issue tracking but they may. In my case, I was dealing with a single repo with 1000 or so contributors, and they were community people so it was very hard to get them to file quality structured bug reports, and the system didn't really allow for asking questions.

It lacks strong organizational features, categorization, issue templates, search, and ability to save filters.

I've seen a lot of projects use it for pull requests and then disable the issue tracker, which is good and bad - you get a better tracker, you miss probably half of the bug reports.
mpdehaan2
·11 anni fa·discuss
Despite having a gazillion issue trackers, something halfway between the two would be welcome.

GitHub issue tracking is not good enough to manage any kind of large project, JIRA is a bit of a beast.

I'd prefer having an integrated JIRA any day, though I do still strongly DISLIKE JIRA. There's still opportunity for something better IMHO.

(For very small teams, I find that's Trello, but Trello isn't really for large groups)
mpdehaan2
·11 anni fa·discuss
I'm a bit curious how much GitHub Enterprise is being adopted.

Obviously winning someone like IBM and HP (I don't know what they use) would be big.

But I see most companies using GitHub private organizations (paid per repo) even when they are sometimes quite large. I might be totally wrong here, but I'm kinda interested in what the split is.

Obviously every software company having a huge chance of keeping their private source control code in you is a big deal, and even "monetize way later" makes sense here considering the dominance they are showing.

And mostly showing without any major improvements to the product (.com) in a LOOOOONG time, but I will say the stability has gotten much better, and I do appreciate that at least.
mpdehaan2
·11 anni fa·discuss
And it's misguided, unfortunately. Companies go to the west cost because investors want them to (which is somewhat one of the same types of problems as tech culture diversity), and you're failing to tap some MAJOR tech centers. It also massively increases costs of living, and reduces diversity of ideas.

SF talent is on the same level of experience and variability, though if anything it's easier for people to job hop.

But what it really does is fail to capitilize on the assets of an entire nation (or nations, in the case where people from other countries think they also need to move).