HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

natureiskino

no profile record

comments

natureiskino
·7 giorni fa·discuss
>I dunno what you mean by "free".

Reality is free. You don't have to waste any resources to model it, you just need to capture it.

>The model is trained on text.

See in my previous reply:

>LLM/AI/AGI/whatever will be

LLMs don't even have a sense of time because they work differently to a human brain.
natureiskino
·8 giorni fa·discuss
>that looks bulletproof to us

And it pretty much is most times. For us. But indeed I did run into the "why would they use it like that though" scenario, where it fails. So I have to patch that usecase. At which point I go all "ok now it's really done" until another fringe usecase pops up and so on and so forth. And I did think about how sure I was it was bulletproof, humbling moment.
natureiskino
·8 giorni fa·discuss
>Whatever world we construct for LLMs, no matter how detailed we make it, will always be a blocky projection of the real domain onto a virtual one.

I don't know exactly why but I never really understood this argument. Might be some kind of control thing? Because for me it's pretty simple, it's basically free to give access to reality. Just add "sensory organs" as it were. I can argue you can make them perceive reality even better than we (humans) do, just enlarge the audio/video spectrums. Bam...more reality. The whole point of the argument is we're missing information.

Again, I get the need for controlling the environment for what LLM/AI/AGI/whatever will be, but that will always cost more than giving them access to like...reality. Same reason I don't really believe in the whole simulation argument, it's just more expensive all around, loses resolution, let alone control. I don't doubt there will be some people that would indulge in neverending hedonism but not all people. You need to give up control for that.
natureiskino
·9 giorni fa·discuss
>Comparing it to the trolley problem is incorrect. COVID had real potential to kill you, even as a young person.

I don't think this is correct. If you remove the people with comorbidities, the risk for healthy young people was minuscule, there's way other issues you should concern yourself with at that point, rather than dying from COVID.

Vaccinating young people with something that had the potential of side effects was just dumb, either way you look at it. I'm honestly baffled it was accepted. It seems to be the product of mass hysteria, sustained by greed for profits.
natureiskino
·mese scorso·discuss
I did not know she's MIT alumni.
natureiskino
·mese scorso·discuss
Looking at New makes for an unfiltered experience, and you accept the nonsense that comes with that, on any platform. At that point it's still unaffected by the hivemind consensus.
natureiskino
·mese scorso·discuss
Holy mother of God this seems like one of those landmark cases by the looks of what's going on. So much rot in there... Bro also fled to Mexico, they could even make a movie out of this.
natureiskino
·2 mesi fa·discuss
[dead]