It needs a revocation clause because yes he can revoke it from new versions, but no he cannot edit the original copy some guy downloaded with the BSD clause.
the only thing I'm seeing from your posts is "I'm a fucking idiot who doesn't understand that C is safer than any interpreted pretend-you're-safe language"
I'll be more interested when they've found a way to work with native binaries on windows, and handle creating/using binaries that take full advantage of the PE's import/export functionality. In reality it's not cross-platform if it doesn't support the almost guaranteed necessary features of the platform -- utilizing compiled dynamic libraries.
Hahaeha, no, warden can and does scan EVERY SINGLE THING on your system. Good luck with fixing that whole "trusting companies that release games I like" thing.
First -- that code appends random file paths to a "content" set. It is used here https://github.com/hackedteam/rcs-common/blob/38290d4eab2b2c...
It's an obvious test case. Let's look at other occurrences of the function:
https://github.com/hackedteam/rcs-common/blob/38290d4eab2b2c...
Random process names and text... wow, obvious test values!